Photographer friend, what makes you reluctant to give up the bulky Quan Huafu SLR?

I think SLR is not heavy. The effect is very good. The picture quality is also quite good, so I have been using it until now.

Because the SLR is professional, it has weather resistance. I have never felt that the SLR is too heavy to carry. The design of SLR is more professional and durable, and the battery is just as easy to use in cold environment. There are many micro-cameras around, and they are often heard to repair cameras. SLR is more durable and generally does not need maintenance.

Because the weight of several hundred grams can be ignored in the whole photographic system. When I go out to take landscape photos, I climb the mountain with a shoulder bag, two bodies, three or four lenses, a filter and a tripod. A pack of dozens of pounds, the lighter one has no reaction.

Every spring, when I shoot birds, I will drive there with my fuselage and 200/500 lens. This lens is about 5 kg, which is not light even if it is not on the fuselage, and it is not light even if the weight of the micro-single is zero. There is also a large tripod that can bear more than 100kg. I don't feel overwhelmed every day.

Go out to take portraits, with 35, 50, 180, fixed-focus lens, as well as various lights, umbrellas, reflectors and so on. , can be lighter, but they are also a bunch of things, don't care about hundreds of grams of energy.

Use Fuji xf 10 when sweeping the street. You can put it in your pocket. Half a camera.

Because the SLR is not bulky, its volume and weight are in the best condition. The pressure of the SLR feels comfortable, but the mobile phone is light and uncomfortable to hold. Professionals like heavy, light plastic that feels full, which is unreliable. 70/300 lens is light, 70/200 lens is heavy, and 70/200 lens is more professional.

The micro camera is mounted on the telephoto lens, just like the tail cover of the lens. The proportion is not harmonious, and the weight is not balanced. Super telephoto lens still works. A machine as big as Canon 1dx has a good vision and center of gravity.

I'm using 8 10 now, and I've been thinking about changing it to a bigger and heavier one, and scouring for a second-hand d4. No money, a larger medium format.

SLR lens group is irreplaceable. Nikon camera has a history of one hundred years, and old lenses can be used. I've been using wrinkle paint 180 lens very well. There are a large number of high-quality old lenses on the market, which are cheap and of good quality, ranging from single-digit millimeters to nearly 1 meter. What kind of focal length is needed? Photography can't be solved by just a set of sleeves, nor can it be invincible by a set of big three yuan. All kinds of macros. Being old is good enough, so why bring you a lighter choice?

You can't bring a 2 kg SLR, but you can also bring a 1 kg micro-single. If you don't have a catty to carry, you can't carry more than a catty? You go to the supermarket to buy a bag of 20 Jin of rice. Can you take it out? When people can't carry a 2 kg SLR, they can't carry a 1 kg micro-single. It doesn't seem to be a problem to get a 10 kg and 8 kg in your 90 s, does it?

People who shout micro single lights all day, don't use the whole system. I think the people below prefer micro-orders.

The first one should be the person who filmed vlog.

Second, a tourist and photographer.

Third, it doesn't have a fixed-focus lens of more than 220 lenses.

The fourth street shooting.

Fifth, the old mage who is tired of playing SLR.

The biggest reason why I don't want to give up heavy photographic equipment is for quality.

No matter how touted the advertisement is, the picture quality of the mobile phone has not reached the level of competition with SLR and micro-single. And the zoom of the mobile phone is not flattering, let alone at night.

The only advantage of mobile phone is its convenience. It is a good choice to take photos and send friends.

Because I play photography, not equipment. To tell the truth, it has been more than 30 years since I first pressed the shutter. Since Seagull 4b, there are more than a dozen broken cameras in use at home (not including two stolen cameras). In the digital age, especially after upgrading from Fuji 4900z to SLR Ke Mei a5d, relevant lenses have been purchased one after another, so it is impossible to change doors easily. Especially now Sony's focus has shifted to the micro-single, and a large number of A-lens with cabbage prices have appeared on the market, and these lenses were once the envy of ordinary people. For example, I bought 2470ZA on 13500, and now there are a lot of 3500 in a treasure. The other two "big ternary" and high-end lenses are only one-third of the price of the year. If you have something to do at this time, turn to a micro-order, you really have money to burn (of course, local tyrants are free).

I play photography, not equipment. I have cheap and good equipment. Why should I worry about other things? What's more, the high-end micro single lens is not only expensive, but also light in weight!

As I grew older, I naturally gave up. Physical strength and figure are more important than image quality. I will know when I am old and weak. If you don't believe me, I have given up the SLR. The previous two machines and four mirrors will become history.

Micro-orders are actually not much lighter! More importantly, the lens group of the micro-single is not complete enough, and it is expensive!

Most photographers have a complete set of equipment. It is unwise to give up the SLR group to pursue micro-sheets, unless you are a local tyrant, such as adding micro-single-conversion and large-capacity memory cards.

In essence, professional SLR is sufficient in terms of workmanship. At present, the picture quality of micro-single shooting can't surpass SLR, let alone replace SLR in battery life, battery life and maneuverability!

If you care about the so-called portability of micro-orders and have an urgent desire to keep pace with the times, into the pit micro-orders are also acceptable.

However, one thing must be understood, whether it is SLR or micro-single, because the essence of photography has never changed! You will not improve your photography skills by giving up the "bulky" SLR into the pit micro-single, nor will you be useless by not giving up the SLR. That's why, you know!

I don't like micro-sheets, saying that micro-sheets are actually a few hundred grams lighter.

I like SLR, because it is fast, easy to handle, easy to operate, more resistant to operation, do not worry about power failure, protective SLR is better than micro-single. To say that SLR is bulky only refers to the fuselage, because the lens weight and size of SLR or micro-single are similar, and there is no difference.

Playing photography, there is not much difference between a few hundred grams of weight and a few hundred grams of light, because good lenses such as super wide angle, especially medium telephoto lenses, are mostly above one kilogram or even several kilograms. Who cares about those hundreds of grams?

Compared with my interest, the weight of SLR is not worth mentioning at all, but it has a practical feeling in my hand. So, I don't think the weight of the SLR is a burden.

Hello, I gave up the bulky Quan Huafu SLR camera a long time ago. Let me tell you why I gave up the bulky Quan Huafu SLR camera for the following reasons:

In fact, Fuji APS fuselage is quite enough, don't you think?

First, the photos I took are mainly used to write photography books, and the maximum print size is A3 or 16 spread.

For my requirements, APS body and lens can fully meet the requirements.

It can even be said that 1 inch card machine can meet my requirements.

In fact, even in photo studios and photography studios, printing more than 40 inches of photos can actually meet the aps body and lens.

For photo studios and photography studios, the main reason is that customers don't have any APS fuselage, because customers want you to use more expensive fuselage and lens, otherwise they will feel that the money spent is not worth it.

In fact, the background blur ability of APS fuselage is also very good, which is better than F 1.2 boasted by M43 fuselage, right?

In the photo above, this combination of reality and reality, you use top-class cameras and lenses, is that right?

Second, I don't pursue a very powerful background blur effect.

It should be, Quan Huafu fuselage, background blur ability, is indeed stronger than APS fuselage.

However, for me, I don't need too much background blur effect myself.

In other words, I'm really not a fan of syrup photography.

I don't like all heavy things, just don't like them.

If I can do it with my mobile phone, I'll just use my mobile phone.

If I can do it with a card machine, I must only use a card machine.

If aps can be used as the fuselage, I will definitely not use Quan Huafu.

Fourth, I am not a technocrat in landscape photography.

For technical landscape photography, it is better to use Quan Huafu, and even use medium format.

However, I am really not a technical party.

I'm not keen on starry photography either.

For friends who are keen on starry sky photography, it is definitely essential to use the Quan Huafu camera.

But, to be honest, for me, I only printed A3 or 16. For the current printing technology, APS body is also satisfactory, although Anita Mui's full-frame body is so good. However, I am not writing a monograph on starry sky photography. I only need a few photos of the starry sky in the photo book, and even the layout is extremely limited, so it is impossible to print a spread. It's good to have a genuine full page.

For 16 full-page printing, the starry sky photographed by APS fuselage is completely enough.

Of course, if you are a star photographer and just want not to lose to others, and you can't lose to others, then don't use APS fuselage.

To sum up, I basically use mobile phones, card machines and APS bodies. I seldom use the Quan Huafu fuselage.

And for many photographers with certain photographic qualifications, I will often strongly recommend APS's Fuji micro-single to them.

In the early days of digital cameras, I was also a user of SLR. As early as Canon's first model was called "Photographer Affordable" 350D, I started to own a SLR, but later I gave up, mainly focusing on micro-cameras.

(canon 350D)

Not because it is light, but because it is a convenient and practical electronic viewfinder. The key to photography is framing. Therefore, the development of the camera is not only the change of the photosensitive material, but also the development of the viewfinder. From box framing, paraxial framing, double lens framing, to SLR optical framing and electronic framing today, it can be said that the viewfinder is developing with the development of the camera, and the camera is becoming more and more advanced with the development of the viewfinder.

The biggest advantage of electronic viewfinder is real-time imaging. You can see the effect of the final photo through the viewfinder before shooting, including composition, light effect and exposure accuracy. In particular, the accuracy of exposure, I can directly judge by eye observation, rather than relying on metering and automatic exposure like SLR. This makes it more convenient to use manual exposure, and you can shoot the tone of the picture you want through manual exposure.

I use a micro-camera, rarely use automatic exposure, and all use M file.

Now, there are still many film friends who are keen on using SLR and Quan Huafu. I think it is mainly due to the following reasons: First, I think SLR is a major in Quan Huafu.

Second, cinematographers already have a large number of Quan Huafu SLR cameras.

Cameras are not carrots and vegetables. You can buy it if you say so. A set of SLR cameras, especially high-end SLR full-frame cameras, are still relatively expensive. Even rich owners will not change them at will. For ordinary photographers, buying a camera should be carefully considered, at least with the approval of family leaders. What's more, some film friends have more than one camera and two cameras, and there are many lenses, so they will not easily change equipment.

Some movie friends think that the microlens lacks a powerful lens group. In fact, there is no shortage of micro-lenses in the market, but the group of SLR lenses in their hands is too large and they have to stick to their own camp.

Third, I don't understand the development of new camera technology.

In reality, many SLR users in Quan Huafu experienced and found the advantages of micro-single in the use of equipment stores, exhibitions and other people, and began to have the idea of changing equipment. From a technical point of view, micro-single, after all, combines more and more new technologies and technologies that SLR cameras can no longer have. Photography itself is the product of science and technology, and every step of its development is closely related to the progress of science and technology.

The reason why users who use SLR still insist on SLR is that they don't pay enough attention to the development of camera technology today, especially the micro-single technology.

It doesn't matter whether you use a SLR or another camera for photography, as long as you can take commendable photos. Don't do to others what you don't want them to do to you, and others don't have to make irresponsible remarks about what equipment they use. Insist on the equipment in your hand, make good use of the equipment in your hand, and shoot good works with the equipment in your hand is the last word.

At present, the micro-single has been clamoring and seems to have the potential to replace the SLR. But it's not easy. After so many years of development, photographers almost have a SLR camera. Look who doesn't have a few shots in his hand. A person has several bodies everywhere at the same time, not to mention all kinds of lenses with focal length. If you want them to throw away the bulky SLR camera overnight and replace it with a micro-single camera, is it possible?

At present, the phenomenon of micro-single expensive and virtual high exists. Even if it is well played, most photographers with SLR will not easily jump into the unfathomable pit of micro-single. For example, a brand's micro-single, now only has a body of more than 20,000, which is almost close to 30,000. No matter how small it is, it will not be accepted by everyone at such a high price. To be honest, it is better to add some money to buy 1dx or d6, or even buy a good lens.

Besides, if you enter the micro-order, you have to change or buy a series of lenses, which are more expensive than SLR cameras. Without strong economic conditions and strength, it is not an easy task to complete micro-single lens. Now some people report micro-single defects, such as short battery life, hot fuselage and easy shutdown. The display looks like a mobile phone. In fact, most photographers may have been fiddling with the bulky SLR in their hands, and the novice photographer Xiaobai may also be scared away by the expensive price of micro-single.