Should the library ban taking pictures?

I don't think taking pictures should be banned. The library is a place for students to expand their knowledge. Students should be allowed to absorb as much knowledge as possible, which is the meaning of the existence of libraries. As for letting students take pictures. In fact, this does not hinder the balance of library order, so it is unnecessary to prohibit students from taking pictures.

The library is a necessary facility for every school. But many schools prohibit libraries from taking pictures, but our school has no restrictions in this regard. Sometimes we can see the school-running style of a school from this angle. Open and enlightened schools will allow students to absorb knowledge more freely after cooking, while closed schools will. Restrict students' knowledge intake.

It is a good thing for students to go to the library to study, if they encounter any confusion in the learning process. Need to keep this question, so not letting it take pictures will limit the answers to these questions? I think so. On the other hand, doesn't taking pictures limit the spread of books? Originally, some interesting books may be liked by more people if they are photographed, but if they are not photographed, they may only be popular in small circles. So taking pictures can actually play the role of spreading books.

At the same time, banning taking pictures in a large area will also arouse students' antipathy and make them reject the library. This is not good for students' design knowledge. Therefore, in the long run, we should also relax the management of the library. As long as books are not damaged or lost, other learning behaviors should not be banned.