What is the standard to measure a good photographic work?

Your title and content are two different questions. Question, what is the standard of good photography? Generally speaking, a panacea can be used to deal with this problem, that is, photography has no standards, creators have their own styles, and audiences have their own aesthetic standards. Similarly, this expression can be used in music, art, literature, architecture, dance, sculpture, food, blind date and so on. However, the textbook has clearly defined the criteria for judging the success of creation. To sum up, it is: 1, the difficulty, including the technical difficulty and the hardships of the shooting process; 2. Creativity; 3. The depth of thought; 4. Decorative. My personal definition of a good photo is very simple, with only three words, that is, "sense of order". Even works that show disorder and disorder, as long as they attract and touch you, must be orderly, but they are not directly shown. This sense of order comes from composition, color, tone and contrast, as well as visual elements, sight, emotions and even metaphors. As long as these elements are properly controlled, they will naturally attract people's attention and make them unforgettable. (In fact, for ordinary enthusiasts, if photography is only regarded as an entertainment activity, there is no need to entangle too many standards. ) "I usually see many photographers' works online, some are landscapes, some are people, some are documentary, and some are sensational. What's the difference between these photos and my own? "-the difference between photos is obvious. You can see the difference with your eyes. This difference is equivalent to the difference between the dishes cooked by Lan Xiang cooking professionals and those cooked by me.

Satisfied, please adopt.