How to evaluate 800 pieces of Zhihu?

For those non-senior non-mainstream audiences and fruit fans who seldom go to the cinema, the fierce battle in the first half of 800 miles and the flag protection in the midfield are enough to be a feast to enjoy the vision and emotions.

As an audience with a certain artistic aesthetic foundation, independent thinking ability and certain historical knowledge, such as me, I am very disappointed with the film.

Industrialization technology is the absolute first-class standard of China films, and Cao Yu's photography is fully capable of winning or even sweeping the three gold trophies next year.

The worst thing is that Guan Hu, the director and screenwriter, made a rare and good theme into a bucket of half-baked popcorn. The escalation of the fighting scene is not exaggerated. Shooting prisoners of war is also a precious bloody flying in China's films, so it is both true and natural to ignore the noise of the Virgin Mary. In the life-and-death battlefield, you should be justified in killing the enemy.

The real mistake is the confusion and lack of values. Without respect and responsibility for history, people can see that there are some despicable business calculations.

First of all, cherishing life does not mean being afraid of death. Too much attention has been paid to cowardly deserters. Such figures will exist, but they are by no means the mainstream of the battlefield. There are too many descriptions of Wujiang and Zhang Yi in the film, including Ou Ou and that small Hubei, which is also the overflow and obscenity of the creator's humanistic consciousness.

Secondly, the cause and effect of the battle of the four-line warehouse in eight hundred heroes was edited by the director himself. It is also acceptable to cut into this historical event from the perspective of fear of using troops. However, the retreat to the concession and the life in the solitary military camp, as well as the ending of General Xie, shouldn't there be a truthful performance? Isn't this an indispensable part of the 800 collective and the whole battle?

This is the real history, and this is the history that you should tell the audience responsibly. Intercepting a bright moment of the event, pinching the head and ending the tail, exaggerating the sensation, and misinterpreting the meaning of anti-war with fear of death are really only a hundred steps away from the threshold of the famous epic.

Thirdly, the proportion of overall freehand brushwork and partial realism in artistic techniques is obviously not suitable for expressing the theme of historical war, especially the creation and viewing environment of China films, which is also contrary to the orientation of film propaganda.

The white horse on the screen is the selfishness of Guan Hu's creation. I'm not talking about history, I'm talking about books by myself. General Xie and Japanese generals met on a white horse, saying that they were fighting for their respective honors. The film has completely collapsed, and four rows of warehouses have collapsed into ruins.

Without emotional commercial calculation, the shooting style of the scene of flag protection on the roof is the same as that in the first half, and the emotional impact and sublimation will only be more real and profound. Instead of being so forced and sensational, it makes people feel tired and embarrassed.

Maybe the director was afraid that the audience wouldn't know, and my film was banned because of this scene. Needless to say, the review is really unsatisfactory. However, the skills and brains of some directors are not necessarily damaged by censorship.

You can't blame the chair for falling on your ass.

The greatest value and significance of 800 films lies in their release, which can let some young people know that even shallow historical events and patriotic feelings are meritorious deeds. As for the artistry of movies, that's another matter. I really don't want to talk about it.