Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography major - Is it possible to use Canon 18-200 lens for travel photography?
Is it possible to use Canon 18-200 lens for travel photography?
If the image quality is acceptable, this lens is fully capable. But if there are certain requirements on image quality, it can’t be helped. The zoom ratio is large and the aperture range is wide. If you take photos that are transparent and clear, , color restoration, and bright pictures are not up to the task.
Uninvited.
18-200 heads, very suitable for travel photography.
At present, major major manufacturers, including shoe manufacturers, toothpaste manufacturers, Sigma and Tamron, basically produce their own 18-200mm lenses. The reason is simple: this lens is very popular.
Since the demand is travel, then the positioning is for home use, entertainment or leisure; and the requirement is very simple, simple and portable.
If your needs are professional and not casual, then the 18-200 is obviously not suitable for you. Please turn left when you go out and choose the 16-35mm + 50mm + 70-200mm wide-angle, fixed-focus and telephoto trio. .
The image quality of the 18-200 at the telephoto end will obviously not cause any inconvenience for home travel photography. On the contrary, the wide focal length it covers and its light weight are indeed a big advantage for home travel. convenient.
But it is worth mentioning that the 18-200 head is exclusive to the residual frame machine. So if you have a full-frame camera, the 18-200 will not fit in your camera.
When designing a lens, major camera lens manufacturers fully consider its positioning. No manufacturer is willing to design a lens that is useless to any group of people.
Laxative
In fact, I have already answered similar questions. In fact, for travel, we cannot generalize whether a professional lens is better or a lens that can travel the world with one lens. Everyone's purpose of traveling is different, which is the key to deciding what equipment to use. For example, girls no longer focus on how well they can take pictures of landscapes, but on taking selfies, so downloading a few beauty apps on one mobile phone is enough. For example, some travelers like to travel light, so a professional digital camera may also be able to meet their needs. Some people travel to a place for business purposes, so they cannot avoid professional equipment weighing dozens of kilograms. Some people don't care about physical strength but only care about picture quality, so ordinary equipment will definitely not be able to meet their needs.
For the 18-200, it is actually a standard one-shot lens that can be used all over the world, but now the better choice is the 18-300. Let’s not talk about the 18-300 first. Let’s talk about the 18-200. . The advantage is naturally that it can cover a wide range of focal lengths and is relatively light, so it will not become a burden for travel. The shortcomings are also obvious. The aperture of this lens is relatively small, which is not a big problem when shooting outdoors during the day. However, at night and indoors, you can basically only shoot with high ISO, which is definitely unacceptable for friends who require high image quality.
Moreover, the long focal length of 200mm is not very advantageous at present. Since you choose one lens to rule the world, you know that the image quality will be sacrificed, so you must not compromise on the focal length and choose a longer lens. The large focal length makes it easy to shoot distant scenes.
In fact, you can also choose lenses according to most of your needs when shooting travel. If you shoot 90% of landscapes and 10% of long shots, can you give up these 10% and bring a good ultra-wide-angle lens? . At least that's what I would choose.
Is it possible? Generally speaking, it is all "can". Yes, Canon 18-200mm is suitable for travel photography. Regarding what kind of camera and lens to use for travel photography, I believe that everyone’s ideas and practices will be different, and there is no so-called best solution.
Moreover, travel photography is actually diverse, with different shooting destinations, different shooting subject preferences, and different shooting styles. Therefore, we must not generalize, that is to say, we cannot say that the Canon 18-200mm lens is the only one.
For some typical situations, let me analyze and recommend them in detail:
1. Photography requires sacrifice to achieve success
I want to take pictures of everything, this Understandable. Unless you are a travel self-media person, in order to write travel notes and guides, you should really shoot everything. A lens like 18-200mm is naturally a great choice.
However, if we want to take some photos that we really want in our hearts, we have to give up something. As for what you give up specifically, this varies from person to person.
2. Alternatives to the 18-200mm lens
To be honest, if it only comes with an 18-200 lens, I think that friends who do travel self-media can definitely buy 1 The image quality of an inch telephoto all-in-one camera is similar to that of a SLR equipped with an 18-200. Moreover, it can be operated with one hand and does not require two-hand operation like a SLR. Well, one-handed operation is really much more convenient than two-hand operation.
If you plan to travel around the world and never look back, just for the sake of traveling, and you are not a landscape photography enthusiast, then, in fact, in order to do it in one go and leave no regrets, I think This Panasonic all-in-one telephoto camera is really a very good choice
Besides, the anti-shake performance of the 1-inch all-in-one telephoto camera is much better than that of a SLR with 18-200. Anti-shake is very useful if you don’t want to bring a tripod. Indeed, generally speaking, people who plan to equip the 18-200 do not plan to use a tripod.
3. Most landscape photography does not require telephoto lenses.
I personally think that telephoto lenses are mainly needed in western China. If you are in the central and eastern regions of China, the focal length of 24-70 or 24-105mm is basically enough for travel photography. For landscape photography enthusiasts, the focal length of 16-35 is the most suitable. However, travel photography and landscape photography are two different things.
For half-frame, in fact, the focal length of Nikon 16-80 or Canon 15-85 is more commonly used for travel photography
For full-frame, 24-105 Or 24-120mm is a more commonly used travel lens
If you travel to European, American or Southeast Asian countries, basically the focal length of 24-70 or 24-105 is enough. There is no need to take a picture of the cross on top of the church.
Four. According to the third point, it is actually possible to buy a 1-inch card camera with a focal length of 24-100.
This, for example, Canon G7 second generation, Sony black card, etc. Yes, they are all good. The picture quality is more than adequate.
5. According to the fourth point, in fact, buying a Huawei P20 with five times lossless zoom is enough. To say the least, buying an Apple 8p is also enough
To be honest, if You are either a photography enthusiast or a travel enthusiast. You are determined not to look back. You are determined to travel all over China and the world. Your pursuit is to travel all over the world, rather than focusing on shooting a certain place. Well, in fact, Huawei P20 is really more than enough.
Lenses ranging from 18 to 200 focal lengths are available not only from Canon, but also from Tamron and Sigma Nikon. A typical one-shot journey to the end of the world and brought to the old age, exclusive for novice users.
The remaining camera has a wide-angle lens and a telephoto lens. The telephoto lens can also blur a bit and make a bird shot. It can also be used for taking pictures of small buildings at a wide angle.
Traveling with nature has its benefits. One lens can serve you all without having to change it.
Disadvantages? Generally, the larger the focal length difference between lenses, the harder it is to achieve good image quality. 18 to 200...as for image quality...don't expect anything extra, especially at the telephoto end, just take a clear shot.
The image quality of this kind of shot that can travel far away in one shot is not very good. I really can’t buy the Tamron one. The image quality is so bad that you think there is something wrong with your focus.
I haven’t used the other ones, but the image quality is definitely worse.
For Canon users, the 18 135 is enough. It has an STM motor, is quiet and fast, and the new version has a USM ring. The picture quality is also much higher.
In short, gays who don’t have much demand for picture quality can buy it, but I don’t recommend it personally.
This lens has an 18mm ultra-wide angle, which can be used to shoot landscapes or buildings
And its telephoto range can compress the background when shooting portraits
It is also a good choice to take pictures of some architectural features and use another way of expression
Pairing a broken frame camera with a large three-dimensional lens with very good optical quality. The red circle lens is meaningless, because The focal length will also change, and this 18-200mm lens can be said to be one of the best choices for residual frame cameras. The optical quality can only be said to be average, but it is more convenient, and you can go anywhere with one lens.
For most photography and travel enthusiasts, this lens is enough. It is a mount lens commonly used by about 70% of beginners. It covers the range from wide angle to telephoto, and basically meets the needs of common photography. Demand, but for photographers who pursue image quality and grand shooting scenes, this lens is not enough.
First of all, the wide-angle end is not wide enough, and the visual tension is not enough for large scenes. For example, when shooting buildings and seaside scenery with rich layers, the creation of high-contrast images in large scenes is relatively weak.
Secondly, the aperture of this lens is not large enough, making it difficult to shoot night scenes in low-light environments, and the blur effect on people in the scenery will not be obvious.
Thirdly, this lens has a wide zoom focal length and a large number of lenses, so the image quality is not sharp enough. For masters who pursue the image quality of landscape blockbusters, the image quality of this lens cannot keep up. .
As for photographic equipment, you basically get what you pay for, so just use whatever grade of equipment you have in your budget! For photographers who take travel snapshots, this lens is still good.
Share a landscape photo I took with the Tamron 15-30F2.8 lens.
- Related articles
- Can science students apply for photography?
- When shooting, if you deal with the problem of color cast, such as shooting a party or dinner with warm colors. Automatic gear yellowing phenomenon is excellent. How about Nikon D700 continuous shooti
- How to use stickers for Apple mobile phones?
- East Palace Episode 25: Smelling Shu Birds in Spring City is homesick (1).
- Is Kunming Mudingxi Group a factory?
- How much does it cost to take commercial photography in Shenzhen Annual Meeting, and how much does it cost?
- Do Xi people think of the "distinct ecological peninsula" in Gaoling County? As an Xi person, I want to know your opinion.
- Does Beijing Maternity Hospital have four-dimensional color Doppler ultrasound?
- How to adjust Xiaomi 4 camera to manual mode
- Where is the best place to travel in March?