Which is better, Dxo one qx 100?

Good is an abstract standard. I think it would be more appropriate to talk about your requirements and change the title to "Which one suits me".

I have dxo one in my hand, but I haven't used qx 100, so I only provide limited opinions for reference.

In terms of image quality, according to some evaluations, qx 100 has great advantages in regular jpg, but dxo has superraw, which can keep more details and provide more space for later. However, the bottom of 1 inch is generally not late, which is convenient for drawing. Only with a7, can we play late.

Dxo focuses faster, but occasionally it is out of alignment. It is reported that qx 100 is in good focus.

In terms of portability, dxo has obvious advantages. Qx 100 is still too big, even the smaller qx 10 is a bit too big.

In terms of connection, a7' s wifi is simply too bad, and its practicality is quite low. It is estimated that qx 100 is similar. Dxo is hardwired, so don't worry about its stability, but you have to have an iphone. . .

The battery is estimated to be half a catty, and the endurance of dxo is a little weak, which is only suitable for low-intensity use. Many netizens report that the battery life of qx 100 is not high.

Probably the above points. If it is used for self-portraits, it must be dxo, especially for children. You will understand the necessity of fast connection and no delay. If used in a tou camera, privacy is still dxo, which is small and difficult to wipe. The light change of qx 100 can help solve this problem, but the lens lengthening will weaken the privacy, which is still the problem. Wifi connection is not reliable, dxo has at least a viewfinder screen. If it is for other shooting purposes, neither is recommended.