Is the poor handling of Nikon D5 100 true? (compared with 600D)

Now the imaging style of Canon Nikon is getting closer and closer, and the so-called Nikon Sharp and Canon Soft Light are becoming less and less obvious with the built-in settings and later period.

Although the pixel of 600D is a little higher than D5 100, in fact, the imaging quality of the two is similar (DxO laboratory's evaluation is D5 100 is better, so don't pay too much attention to this, at least D5 100 is not bad). Not to mention the gap between the display screens. There is a difference between the two key dials, but the style is different. Just use them.

The advantage of Nikon D5 100 is the linkage of metering and focusing. However, most of Canon's SLRs are not available, and there are not many people complaining. In fact, not many people use it, and novices don't mind. D5 100 has no motor, but all new Nikon lenses have motors, including 50mmF 1.8G, which is just a little expensive. Considering that D5 100 fuselage is cheaper, this is nothing.

In the past, Nikon D5000 flipped the screen, with the rotating shaft at the bottom, and the photos were still relatively low-key. It's all on the left now. Self-portraits are also convenient and not low-key, and the homogenization phenomenon is serious.

Let's not talk nonsense. If you pay attention to cost performance and don't plan to play with old lenses, then choose Nikon D5 100. After all, it is cheaper and the performance is not bad at all. If you are worried about the body motor of Nikon D5 100 and happen to have an old Nikon D head at home, then sell the old D head and buy a Canon 600D.