Should the person who filmed the fire be condemned?

Recently, a video titled "Fire Fighting for 42 Seconds" was circulated on the Internet. The video shows that a fire broke out in a residential building, and the man in the building was pushed to the front of a fire-fighting security window and shouted for help. After updating fiv e, Weibo, the fire chief of Guangdong, "strongly criticized" Weibo and filmed a video. It is understood that the fire broke out in Huadu District, Guangzhou on April 14, and the man was killed in a call for help.

In the information age, everyone may act as a media reporter. In case of emergency, they are still faced with the choice of recording or rushing. For professional journalists and photographers, the industry tends to have a "first person, followed by a recorder". Speaking of this, many people will think of the "vulture and African children" incident. There is no doubt that if photographers are capable of humanitarian rescue, it is time to put down their cameras or mobile phones to save them.

Whether the 42-second cruel shooting in Guangzhou should be condemned depends on whether the photographer has the ability to rescue the problem. If you can call the police, or the trapped person can be pulled out, or you can put it on a ladder to water it ... If he doesn't do it, he should be despised. If he does his duty as a policeman, he can do nothing else and record a public event on the side of the shooting incident, which is still a "neutral" behavior.

@ 京京京京京京京 lies, the photographer will cry the last struggle of the trapped person and will not handle the public transmission of audio and video. In the fire, the trapped person's last moment of life involves the right of personal dignity and the feelings of family. Publicly spreading cruel horror audio and video also violates the public media order. In this view, it is obvious that communicators should learn to determine reasonable legal boundaries on information dissemination.

A few days ago, a video called "The shooter was cruel for 42 seconds" was circulated on the Internet. The video shows that a fire broke out in a residential building, and the man in the building was forced by the fire to an external window security window, crying and calling for help. Later, Guangdong fire official William updated five Weibo, which was "strongly spurned" and issued a document condemning the video shooter. It is understood that a fire broke out in Huadu District of Guangzhou on April 14, and the man who called for help was finally killed.

In the information age, everyone may act as a "reporter" from the media. When an emergency happens, they are also faced with the choice of "recording or rushing". For professional journalists and photographers, there is often a saying in the industry that "people are the first, and then the recorder". Speaking of this, many people will think of vultures and African children. There is no doubt that if the photographer could provide humanitarian assistance at that time, he should put down his camera or mobile phone to save people.

Whether Guangzhou's "42-second barbaric shooting" should be condemned depends on whether the photographer has the ability to rescue it. If he can call the police, or if he can pull the trapped person out, or if he can water it and hand over a ladder ... if he doesn't, he should be cast aside. If he has fulfilled his obligation to call the police and can't do anything else, it may be a "neutral" behavior to stand by and shoot and record public events.

The anger of @ Guangdong Firefighter also lies in the fact that the photographer publicly spread the audio and video of the trapped person's last crying and struggling without processing. The last moment of the life of the people trapped in the fire involves personal dignity and the feelings of their families. Publicly spreading cruel and horrible audio and video is also a violation of public media order. From this point of view, communicators should obviously learn to distinguish between reasonable and legal on the issue of information dissemination.