Does digital photography need post-production?

It depends, not all the time. However, the latter part is indispensable. We see that all photographic works need to be original, and we all expect the original picture without any modification. But sometimes, as long as you paint a little later, the picture will become more attractive

There are many photo competitions now, and the documents distributed in them require that the photos can be simply colored, which means that the post-work can be carried out after the shooting is completed.

If we have to discuss whether it is necessary, of course I think it is necessary. Photography should really pay more attention to the work itself, or the photographer's ability and his ideas. But in the simple later period, he didn't change these original things, but showed the shortcomings and works more perfectly after decoration. It's like painting. The manuscript you drew will be more beautiful after being decorated with pigments.

The existence of the later period has its own significance. When we need it, we still have to study later. Your skin color and other aspects will be greatly improved. Some photos are really beautiful when they are first taken, and the composition, color and light are perfect, so they are not needed later. But this is a small part after all, and you are not a master. Every picture is spared.

If you just shoot, someone else suddenly pops up in the camera, by this time you have finished shooting. You didn't need it in your original lens. What if it appears now? Just right on the edge. At this time, you need post-editing, just edit directly, and you will still have the same photo effect.