Is it plagiarism to shoot the same action in the same studio?

If the content inside is the same, or basically imitated, then it must be plagiarism. If only one clip has the same style and technique, it is not plagiarism.

Visual plagiarism is much more complicated than text plagiarism. Plagiarism basically means using the same words or similar words to express the same meaning, but without labeling the original author or even declaring that he is the original author. I believe it is a very familiar concept for some people who have written papers, which is a similar type of academic plagiarism that we often say. But there is another very important element in word plagiarism, that is, "creativity". Why is it so difficult for those plagiarized writers to sue plagiarists? Because the current law is that the original author must prove that he is original, and he was the first to come up with this idea. Rather than a widely used theme, it is equivalent to * * * using resources (public domain). Therefore, unless the plagiarist is very brazen and uses the words of the original author, it will generally be ruled that there is no plagiarism.

Visual plagiarism is a more complicated concept than literal plagiarism, because it also involves derivative works. Secondary creation means that the creator takes many works as inspiration and creates on the basis of inspiration, but secondary creation is not visual plagiarism.