Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography major - This paper analyzes the success or failure of the adaptation of Hamlet and Thunderstorm by The Banquet and The Golden Flower in the City.

This paper analyzes the success or failure of the adaptation of Hamlet and Thunderstorm by The Banquet and The Golden Flower in the City.

Thunderstorm by Cao Yu is a classic with great stage vitality. According to his own understanding and the needs of the commercial operation of the film, Director Zhang Yimou edited, added and deleted Thunderstorm, and put forward The Golden Flower in the City. However, Golden Flower extracts the most essential fatalism and religious original sin consciousness in Thunderstorm, and only borrows the character setting and story frame in Thunderstorm, and then supplements it.

=====================================================================

Banquet, China's Hamlet. The name "Banquet" comes from Han Xizai's Banquet. The story outline of this film is based on the plot of a court struggle in The Poem of Daming Palace and strengthens its drama, explaining the eternal themes of Greek drama-revenge, love and death in the impermanence of fate. The banquet revealed people's desires. From the prosperous Tang Dynasty to the era of disintegration, the extravagance of non-nouveau riche could not be extinguished. Man creates everything, changes everything and destroys everything in desire.

====================================================================

Yesterday, I watched TV by bus. Suddenly, I saw someone think that "Golden Flower in the City" was suspected of copying "Thunderstorm". Think about the plot, it's all the same! It just changed the background of the story, but with this change, it was a complete failure. The same plot, different historical background, different ideas naturally. Thunderstorm is mainly the contradiction between bourgeoisie, proletariat and feudal society, and it is the concentration of class contradictions; However, when it comes to "the city is full of golden flowers", it is nothing but ambiguity. From a profound ideological point of view, it is only the product of entertainment hype, and it is a profitable business!

Mass production is not enough, and no amount of money can cover up the poverty of cultural heritage. Just like a stubborn old man, no amount of titles in front can hide the shadow of a photographer.

======================================================================

Well, I can't believe someone asked directly.

By the way, I'm also looking for information everywhere and saying =

=

Why did you give us the final outline but there was no answer ~

Mixed x

======================================================================