Choose 1DX2 or D850 (considering subsequent shots)?

One is a speed machine, and the other is a high-quality machine, depending on your shooting needs. Canon 1dx2 is the flagship single camera, focusing on high-speed continuous shooting. 1DX2 is a very good choice if shooting outdoor, sports and sports themes.

Canon also has a very professional EF lens group, which can be said to be perfect for shooting such subjects. So far, this camera has developed to the third generation, and its performance is more powerful.

The disadvantage is that the pixels are not high and not suitable for everyone.

Nikon D850 pixel is higher, which is convenient for photographers to cut later, and gives many people the opportunity to make a second composition. If you don't pay much attention to it in the early stage, it will be very practical to cut it later.

The tolerance of 850 is also famous. I think it is one of the best SLR cameras at present. It is very suitable for shooting scenery, documentary humanities and such subjects with varied light. Later, it was easy to pull back the details and the noise was well controlled.

Nikon's disadvantage is that the recognized lens group is not as powerful as Canon, and many lenses are old and have not been updated. Nikon is now focusing a lot of energy on the Z-mount system, and its support for SLR lenses is obviously less.

Canon has a rich lens group. 1DX2 positioning high-speed machine is suitable for outdoor, sports and other subjects. Although the machine is great, not everyone needs it. If you happen to have many such shots, Canon will never let you down.

Nikon 850 is more suitable for the general public. The camera has higher pixels and better picture quality, and has a good performance in shooting landscapes, documentaries and portraits. If this part of your subject matter occupies the majority, I think D850 will not let you down. This generation of Nikon D850 can be said to be painstaking and well worth buying.

People who can consider 1Dx2 are not short of money at first sight!

To tell the truth, as the flagship machine of Canon today, 1Dx2 is a professional photographic weapon for photographers.

Tell me about my experience:

The first is fast focusing speed and fast continuous shooting speed. As a photographer who can't miss any moment, continuous shooting speed and focus speed are absolutely very important. Especially in sports photography, all actions take place at critical moments. For example, in the World Cup, if you shoot a header without flagship machine, you may only get one usable photo, while Canon 1Dx mark2 allows you to shoot five photos with the ball, which means that for professional journalists, you have five photos for editing. More directly, if you are a contracted photographer, you have five photos for sale. This output ratio is directly increased by 5 times, and the price is only 2 times that of ordinary professional machines. I think it's quite cost-effective when I think about it.

Of course, 1Dx Mark2 also has its problems:

Because in order to improve the speed of continuous shooting, his butt is small, and the effective pixels are naturally low, which is actually a great disadvantage for people who like to pursue image quality.

This is also the reason why there are not many works by flagship machine in Jose's award-winning works over the years:

Moreover, considering that there is sports photography in the Netherlands, sports photography is generally shot in flagship machine. In other words, in other awards, there are almost no works produced by flagship machine. On the contrary, the utilization rate of 5D3 will be higher. It's really that flagship machine really doesn't stand out in the photos that pay more attention to quality and expressiveness.

Let's start with Nikon D850. As an upgraded version of D8 10, D850 also pays attention to image quality:

Let's take Lotus Racing as an example. Previously, Photolari released the statistics of equipment used in the winning works of the 20 18 Lotus Competition. These data cover 97 of 129 award-winning photos. Although it is not completely covered by 100%, the data is instructive enough. Among them, Nikon D8 10 has greatly surpassed Canon 5D3.

As an enhanced version of D8 10, D850 inherits the advantages of D8 10, and the continuous shooting speed has also been improved. The D850 supports about 7 continuous shooting per second. When using the separately purchased battery box MB-D 18 and the separately purchased lithium-ion battery pack EN-El 18A/EN-El 65438+, in any case, his continuous shooting speed can't reach the level of flagship machine.

Generally speaking, choose D850 or 1dx mark2, depending on personal pursuit. If you choose to shoot sports photography, there is no hesitation. Canon 1Dx Mark2 is your first choice. But if it is based on personal interests, or even documentary news, then D850 is enough to meet your needs.

Considering the follow-up shots, if we only talk about the original factory and the branch factory, it will be a bit too much. Canon's biggest advantage is those 1.2 fixed focus.

The old version before 50 1.2 85 1.2 was a great progress as long as Jiao Wai didn't want sharpness, but it was basically only for portraits, and the price was really not low. And Nikon can only watch cheap and easy to use 135 2.

On the other hand, Nikon's mainstream fixed focus is also fully developed. At present, the price of E series 281.4E581051.4E is not low, and there are many opinions on the Internet. You can search if you are interested, but the advantage of Nikon is that those 1.8g series are very cheap from 20 to 85, and the quality is great.

Zoom, I use it myself, but I don't think there is much difference. The support of the vice factory is also good. In addition, Nikon still has yellow under automatic white balance, which is much better than before, but it still exists.

If portraits are the mainstay, Canon must have an adequate budget. It is recommended not to use the 5d4 6d2 1d series to capture many situations, but the 5Dseries is not easy to use. Insufficient budget. The price of Nikon 1.8g series 28 35 85 2k is still very comfortable.

The scenery of the big environment still suggests that Nikon is not sharp, tolerance is real, and high documentary street shooting and the like can be done.

If you can't mix colors and don't plan to learn, Canon's color is good (do you want to learn photography well or ignore this)

Nikon's creative shooting in dark or extreme light is true and tolerant.

The question only mentioned Canon Nikon and SLR, and I won't say the rest.

It depends on what brand of camera you have. Canon and Nikon operate in different forms. I have used Nikon cameras for decades, and the setting modes of all Nikon models are basically the same. Canon is different. Basically, it's a model, a setting mode, because I'm a photography teacher at a university for the elderly and have come into contact with many students' various models of Canon cameras. Each model has a different switching power supply and different setting buttons. This is a bit difficult for me as a skilled Nikon player. But they can all solve the problem of setting, just need to look at it for a long time.

This is an asymmetric choice between Guan Gong and Qin Qiong, right? Please correct the problem: Choose 1DX3 and 5D5 SLR, or D5 and D850 SLR, body and lens group. I suggest Sony A9 and A7R4 electronic viewfinder micro-monocular body and original micro-monocular lens group, because the continuous shooting speed of OVF optical head-up viewfinder of 1DX3 is 16 frames/second, and the weight of the body is about 1500g, which is not the original 22 of 215 g. 1dx345,000 yuan, 135 Quan Huafu micro-single-speed snapshot flagship A9 and Quan Huafu high-pixel micro-single A7R4 are both lighter than 135 Quan Huafu Canon Nikon SLR flagship, and there is also a hand-held "double anti-shake" superposition effect of five-axis anti-shake and anti-shake lens.

The positioning of these two cameras is very clear, and it is not difficult to choose.

D850 is a high-pixel image quality machine with high pixels and wide dynamic range, which is especially suitable for shooting landscapes and large advertisements. The image quality is almost the same as that of entry-level medium format.

In camera shooting, the comprehensive performance of 1DX2 is obviously better than D850, and it is also better than D850 in touch-screen autofocus, automatic white balance, straight skin color and so on. Our company's 1DX2 is used for video shooting.

Of course, 1DX2 is bigger and heavier than D850.

It depends on what you shot. Take Canon for example. The color is more comfortable.

Not bad money. How about another 5,600 direct 1dx3?

Choose D850, high pixel, high latitude and high sensitivity. All kinds of themes are excellent, and the shutter speed has reached 9 frames per second, so it is no problem to shoot birds. As for the lens group, there is no need to entangle between Nikon and Canon.

Actually, there's nothing to consider. Buy a speed machine 1d3 (shooting sports), d6 (shooting animals) and a9m2 (flying birds or bullets) and a high-pixel d850 (small scene) and a7r4 (big scene). The high-end machine is equipped with high-end lenses, and three high-end lenses are not bad ...