Huawei p50pro vs Xiaomi 1 1ultra: Who is the real king of images?

Judging from the test results, there is a gap between the two machines. It took me a while to get p50p for the first time. I want to keep who shoots better, and I have seen many comments on the Internet. The feeling is not as real as my own test, so I made a comparison according to the purpose of pursuing the best effect in practical application.

P50p doesn't know why it didn't compare with Xiaomi 1 1u according to the test results at Huawei's press conference. According to its own designated unified track, P50p actually chose Apple 12promax with low test scores. Commercial speculation is not much to describe, let's take a walk. Compare photos taken at the same time and basically at the same location.

It's cloudy in the morning and the light is soft. The shooting time before and after the two photos should not exceed 30 seconds.

There are some differences in the fuzzy algorithm between the two cameras. Huawei's large aperture calculates the blur effect of depth of field, and Xiaomi can only blur through portrait mode. Although the modes are different, we only compare the differences of fuzzy algorithms. According to the default data, the aperture size of these two phones is not set manually.

In the era of digital photos, the image resolution is still to obtain the original data through the lens, and then calculate its own style through ai algorithm. Some people like the effect of high sharpness, saying that the picture quality is good and clear, and many photographers dare not send films without sharpening. Others say that virtual reality changes orderly, and it changes inside and outside the focus, making the image soft and layered. I don't comment, but fat is different from back elbow. I'll see for myself!

Everyone has his own optimization scheme for white balance, and it is hard to say who is right or wrong under these two effects. After all, the mobile phone can't use the gray board to unify the white balance before shooting, or it depends on your own preferences. If you understand the later photography, you have to re-color it.

As for the fact that both mobile phones have wide-angle macro, I won't test this, because wide-angle macro is meaningless, and everything photographed has serious wide-angle distortion, which has no aesthetic feeling at all, let alone the practical significance of photography. I will compare the best macro effect according to the approximate equivalent focal length I have explored.

These days, I found that p50p can take a very nice macro effect of dandelion with 2.3 times zoom. Today, I also took the same 2.3 times zoom picture on Xiaomi 1 1ultra for comparison. The same label is 2.3 times, but look at the photo data At this time, the focal length of Xiaomi is equivalent to 38mm, and Huawei p50p is equivalent to 63mm, so let's compare it according to the basic proportion of snails in the picture.

Let's compare the screenshot effect of 100% enlarged in the above picture. In the default shooting mode, the screen sizes of the two machines are Huawei 4096x3072 and Xiaomi 4080x3060, which are slightly smaller.

The following picture is compared with dandelion. Why is it more realistic than macro effect? The reason is that mobile phone photography of flowers and plants accounts for more in mobile phone photography applications. Mobile phone cameras are used to take pictures, not to compare scores in exams.

These two comparisons are not about the focal length. According to how to focus on two suspended dandelions, it can be used as a standard in real shooting.

Two architectural photos in the same position, Xiaomi has a wider angle, so take them out and take pictures of your own understanding and views.

At the same position and time, open the maximum wide angle and shoot by hand. They don't use the tripod default mode to shoot, and they don't use their own night scenes.

Also in the same position, no tripod is used, and the shooting is completely handheld. If it is obviously not dominant for Huawei to shoot the night scene with a tripod, the color tone is gray and there are no three levels of black, white and gray, then the daily hand-held shooting shall prevail.

Because telephoto is comparable to optical zoom in practical photography applications, digital zoom is not photography. At present, the optical telephoto effect of Xiaomi has been finalized online, and it is no longer used for comparison. Regardless of video or photos, Xiaomi's five-fold dimming has great practical advantages.

P50p finally gave Huawei a super wide angle in hardware configuration, which I have been looking forward to. Compared with the previous generation products, the color has changed greatly, changing the original thick and cold color. Now the colors are just bright and pleasing to the eye. What is the actual difference between ai and optical computing? I'm not an R&D engineer, so I don't pretend to understand. I only look at the application effect. If you are an experienced photographer and know the composition of the three major aspects and five tones of an image, don't do what you don't understand, such as the suppression of highlights and the blurring of edges. There is no perfect big frame tone in the image to talk about any details!

In terms of shooting experience, Huawei obviously has fast focus, fast shooting speed and high definition, but it can't preview the effect before shooting, especially in night time-lapse photography and professional mode, and it is inconvenient to adjust the parameters after shooting several times to see the effect. The biggest disadvantage of Xiaomi is that it is slightly sticky when pressing the shutter, and it doesn't feel brittle. The picture quality of Xiaomi feels more like the effect of camera shooting. The image quality is softer, the depth of field is richer, and Huawei's digital sense is stronger.

The samples taken above are not completely compared according to the same focal length and the same parameters. After all, the hardware parameters of the two mobile phone cameras are completely different. I pursue the best results completely according to my daily photography. After all, mobile phone cameras are used for exams. I don't explain who likes whose style better and who is better. Everyone has their own preferences and brand beliefs. This paper just makes a general effect comparison from the perspective of practical application, and each has its own needs!

Some people like to dismember camera parts to show off their feelings. Here, as long as the country allows production and sales, as long as our own brands gradually occupy the main share of the mobile phone market, it is the pride of our people. As merchants, they have their own survival rules at different stages. As consumers choose according to their own needs, why do they have to show off their cocks before eating hens?