Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography major - A father in Henan gave his daughter's 200,000 savings to his son to open a shop. Why did father do this?

A father in Henan gave his daughter's 200,000 savings to his son to open a shop. Why did father do this?

Mainly because the father is partial to his son. That's why I did it.

In fact, in many areas, son preference is still widespread. In order to have a son, some people will choose to let the other half have a son for themselves after giving birth to two or three daughters. This situation mainly comes from the idea of son preference, but I personally think that the present society should call for equality between men and women.

First, it is mainly because the father prefers his son.

This Henan father gave his son the 200,000 yuan saved by his daughter to open a wedding dress shop, which is undoubtedly eccentric. This is not fair to my daughter. Because the father's daughter wants to buy a house of her own through her own savings of 200 thousand. But because of his father's partiality, he gave his 200,000 yuan to his son to open a wedding dress shop. This series of actions can only show that my father is eccentric.

Second, what the father did was unfair to his daughter.

In fact, for most fathers, both sons and daughters will treat them with the same heart. But the father's practice makes people feel that a bowl of water is flat, because the father opened a wedding dress shop for his son with the 200 thousand earned by his daughter. In this case, the son did not open his own wedding dress shop through his own efforts, but chose to accept his father's money, so in this case, both the father's practice and the son's practice are unfair to his father's daughter.

Third, my personal views on this matter.

Personally, I think the girl is a victim in this incident and a person worthy of the whole family's concern. Because it proves that the girl saved 200 thousand through her own efforts, but her father opened a wedding dress shop for her brother with it. In this case, the payer is a girl, which proves that the girl's contribution has not been recognized by her family. So I think what the father and the girl's brother did was wrong.