Car driver

In fact, the Quan Huafu micro-single is not much more portable than the SLR. Even if the body is lighter, the lens is not much lighter. Moreover, if it is equipped with an original cow head, it is basically a big head and a small body, and the grip is not as good as that of the SLR.

However, since the subject adheres to the micro-order, and it belongs to Quan Huafu, let's follow the subject's thinking.

For pure home use, Canon EOSR or RP is the first choice. The color is good, the focus is strong, and the operation of touching the folding screen is too convenient.

If the studio is engaged in business, or Sony's menu system is not exclusive, Sony A7m3 or A7R3 is preferred, R3 is preferred for taking photos, and 7M3 is preferred for video. If the money is not bad, the new A7R4 is certainly better. These cameras with a Longteng 28-75 can basically meet the needs of daily shooting, and are much lighter than the original 24-70 2.8.

Sony micro-single has another advantage, the lens compatibility is the best, and it can almost perfectly call the mainstream lenses of Canon and Nikon; Black technology Sigma and Longteng are developing new lenses for it.

Finally, I recommend Nikon Z6 and Z7, both of which are good machines, but XQD storage is too expensive. If you do business, you will be incompatible with other machines, and it is difficult to change the lens and adjust the color.

As for Panasonic S 1 and S 1R, unless you are in the video business, it is not recommended, it is too small.

In fact, micro-single is a gimmick of merchants. The weight of SLR and micro-single host is similar. The main weight is the heavy lens, and the photographic lens is very important.

Looking for Quan Huafu micro-single recommendation, want to buy a good picture quality, lightweight, easy to travel and carry?

There are three major brands in Quan Huafu, Sony, Canon and Nikon. Sony is the earliest micro-single manufacturer in Quan Huafu with the richest product line. Canon and Nikon entered the micro-single field in Quan Huafu from 20 18. To choose Quan Huafu Micro-single, you can only choose from these three brands.

In order to meet your needs, have good image quality and portability, I recommend you to choose Canon's Quan Huafu micro-single. There are three reasons: First, the image quality of Canon Quan Huafu micro-single is very good, especially in JPEG format. At present, Canon Quan Huafu has four micro-orders, namely, entry-level EOSRP, intermediate EOS SR and EOS SR 6, and flagship EOSR5. Among them, EOSRP and R6 have 20 million pixels, the former 26.4 million and the latter 20.4 million, EOS SR has 30 million pixels and EOSR5 has 45 million pixels. High pixel sensor is the basic guarantee of high image quality. Whether it is details, tolerance, or layering, it has a good performance. Second, Canon's Quan Huafu micro-lens is small in size and light in weight, not only small in size and light in weight, but also the RF series high-quality lens specially developed by Canon for Quan Huafu micro-lens is the smallest and lightest lens in the same focal length. The body and lens are small and light, and portability is the best among the three brands. Thirdly, Canon's Quan Huafu micro-single lens group is very mature, which can meet the needs of photographers and professional photographers to shoot multiple scenes. How to choose among the four items depends on your own budget and the other party's purpose. If the budget is sufficient, of course, you can directly start with the flagship EOSR5, travel shooting, and choose 16-35 wide-angle zoom and 70-200 medium telephoto zoom to meet the demand. If you are a business enthusiast, but not a professional photographer, you can choose EOSRP, which is an entry-level Quan Huafu micro-single with the best cost performance. Using a 24- 105 RF lens can basically meet the needs of most travel photography.

At present, Quan Huafu Weidan owns the following consumer brands: Sony, Canon, Nikon and Panasonic. Why don't you mention Leica? Because Leica is very expensive, I think people who can buy Leica casually don't have to ask here, just buy it.

According to your requirements, first of all, you should be light, and Panasonic directly ruled it out. Panasonic's body and lens are not light. So Panasonic ruled out this possibility.

Then, if the picture quality is good and it is a travel shot, then Canon is excluded. Canon's advantage lies in the lens, not the fuselage. Canon's body width and high sense are not dominant, and non-reflective focusing is not good, at least not at present, so if you want good picture quality and scenery, Canon micro-single will be fine.

This leaves Sony and Nikon, and then talk about their advantages and disadvantages.

Sony is undoubtedly the king of micro-singles. After all, this thing is made by Sony, and Sony's focus is the best in the micro-single. Nikon is unparalleled. After all, Nikon also uses Sony's coms.

The advantage of Sony over Nikon is that the original lens group has basically become a system, and there are basically large ternary and small ternary lenses, and the picture quality is good and relatively light. Nikon has not yet completed the size of three yuan, and there are fewer lenses and more. Although you can transfer your own F-mount G and E lenses, you can still transfer them, and you can't realize the advantage of short flange.

To sum up, Sony has great advantages in terms of image quality, volume and weight, and lens group. Are there any shortcomings? Yes, the lens is expensive! However, this kind of expensive lens is relative to SLR lens, and the lens without anti-reflection is not cheap. From SLR to anti-reflection regime change, it is the first generation of lenses, and it is strange that manufacturers don't come to bonus hunter at this time.

Ok, the brand is confirmed, then the fuselage, a7r3 is almost the first choice, 4200w pixel is still the mainstream configuration, plus excellent tolerance and color depth, which is relatively good and has no choice.

It's not over yet. We have several options. First, a7r2, which is very similar to a7r3, uses the same coms. The difference is that a7r3 has made some optimizations in focusing, continuous shooting and battery life, but these optimizations are not squeezing toothpaste, but improving quality. If you are sensitive to price, you can consider it.

Then there is a7m3, Sony's bucket machine. The pixel is slightly lower, the high sensitivity is slightly better than a7r3, the color depth and tolerance are similar, and the price is advantageous. It's probably better to focus on continuous shooting, which is also very good.

Then there are Nikon z7 and z6. Although excluded by the exclusion method, I personally prefer Nikon's human-computer interaction, Bisogni's is more humanized, and there are relatively cheap and abundant lens groups that can be transferred without loss. These are the places that attract me. The foundation of Z7 with more than 4,700 W pixels is even more powerful than a7r3, and z6 is a bucket machine with a cost of about 10,000 yuan. These two are also clearly positioned.

Then Canon eosr can actually be considered. If you travel a7r3 alone and bring your sister, you can consider eosr. It's a tradition for Canon to photograph your sister. Although it is about to be broken now, tradition still has some advantages. As long as the light is not complicated, feel free to play it back to your sister. Rp really does not recommend it. Backup machine, transition machine, home machine, rp is better than m50.

The prices of z7 a7r3 a7m3 eosr z6 and a7r2 have dropped from 2w to about1W. You can choose your favorite after learning more.

By the way, both Sony and Nikon have anti-shake bodies, but Canon doesn't. Anti-shake in low light is very important.

According to your request, I personally think that the newly listed Leica Q2 is the most suitable. Quan Huafu with 47.3 million pixels has a large aperture fixed lens of 1.7, and the focal length of 28 can be changed by 35, 50 and 75. The first four shots of a shot don't need to be changed, and the picture quality is clear, which is very suitable for taking portraits, landscapes, folk customs and sweeping streets. The biggest bright spot is easy to carry, waterproof performance and first-class inorganic energy rate. This year, this camera accompanied me on a 34,700-kilometer trip to the border of China in 8 1 day. )

Quan Huafu is the first choice. The lens starts with a fixed focus of 35 or 50, and you will know how to match the equipment after one year.

The micro-single field is still Sony. Canon and Nikon still have the shadow of SLR in the past, and they are basically in the position of pursuers. As for the portable, you can choose Sony a6 series. Easy to use and practical.

Q2 is light and easy to carry, with excellent picture quality, Quan Huafu.

Looking for Quan Huafu micro-single recommendation, want to buy a good picture quality, lightweight, easy to travel and carry?

A: Dan Wei, Quan Huafu.

(1) The smallest is Sony A7 II (FE 28-70mm).

(2) The lightest is Sony A7 II (FE 28-70mm).

(c) Sony A7 II (FE 28-70mm) is the most cost-effective.

Package price: 7499 yuan

At present, Sony Dafa 7R4 micro-camera has attracted much attention, with its camera speed, eye focus and 4K video. It is rumored that it has the potential to subvert all SLR. Yesterday at noon in Beijing Wukesong Photography Equipment City, Sony Exhibition Hall experienced this 60-megapixel family photo micro-single instrument. It will be put into the market this month, with about 27 thousand bare metal.

If you are interested and have enough disposable budget, you can learn about it.