Is there a big difference between Canon 5d2 and 5d4 in shooting effect, in terms of image quality?

From a professional point of view, the image quality of these two cameras is 5D2 better than 5D4! Why should we look at it from a professional point of view? This is to distinguish between civilian use. Because professional shooting is carried out when the light index allows, civilian use is more casual. 5D4 has an advantage in the case of insufficient light.

The advantages of 5D2 are good color saturation and good color reproduction. Disadvantages are slow focusing and low sensitivity (iso). These are the reasons of the times, and have nothing to do with image quality. If you don't stop focusing on friends who like shooting, it will also bring inconvenience, but it is not a problem for professionals.

If I am engaged in professional photography, I think 5D2 is good in terms of cost performance and 5D2 in terms of image quality alone.

Off-topic, most people who like to take pictures with new products are photographers, because the new models have improved in all aspects, but the most important picture quality has even declined (5D3 is). Business is business. It is impossible for a machine not to be replaced for 10 years. But we should remember one thing, what is the main purpose of cameras and taking pictures. Good picture quality is the last word!

The difference lies in this brain behind the camera.

Canon 5D2 is a famous machine, but its biggest weakness is the poor focus at 9 o'clock, followed by the focus problem in video shooting. All this has been completely surpassed in the 5D4 generation, so there is no doubt that 5D4 has completely surpassed 5D2. However, as far as shooting is concerned, in general, the difference in image quality is not that great. 5D4 is 30 million pixels, and 5D2 is 2 1 10,000 pixels. In the case of good focusing and lighting conditions, there is little difference between the photographed things, and even it is difficult for the naked eye to distinguish them. However, when used in low light and high sensitivity, the advantages of 5D4 are definitely obvious. In short, no matter how good the machine is, it depends on who is using it. A good horse only deserves a good rider.

Is there a big difference between Canon 5d2 and 5d4 in shooting effect, in terms of image quality? I am here to comment on these two models as a user.

Canon's 5d2 is an old machine. Although it is old, its shooting is quite good. In many ways, I think its picture quality and quality are more than 5d4.

This mainly refers to shooting still images. Of course, in other aspects, such as video shooting, pixels, focusing and so on, 5d4 still has certain advantages. Although 5d2 has been used for a long time, the color is still quite good, with good saturation and good color reproduction.

In terms of high sensitivity, 5d4 is still much better. After all, it is a relatively new machine.

5d2 was called "invincible rabbit" by players in those days, which made sense.

In fact, the pictures taken by the two machines are really difficult for us ordinary people to distinguish. As for the pixels with a difference of 1000, it is really difficult to distinguish them.

As for the quality of the machine, the most important thing is the people who use it. Only by improving one's aesthetics and mastering exquisite photography techniques can one shoot excellent works at the right time and place.

The above is my simple view, and your comments and supplements are welcome.

Sword dance video, western photographers, welcome to pay attention.

I have both of them. In terms of image quality, 5d2 is better than 5d4, with better image quality, good saturation and natural color transition. If it is slow photography, such as taking scenery, you don't need to focus quickly. 5d2 is better than 5d4, and 5d4 is better than focusing and video, and it doesn't exceed100000 pixels.

As far as the second floor is concerned, what are the other answers about? Study hard if you don't understand. It is shameful to talk nonsense. From the point of view of taking pictures, focusing at nine o'clock is enough. If you have more focus, this is a good focusing function. What does it have to do with image quality?

If it is recommended to wait for 5D4 to shoot video, the fuselage is balanced after all. 4K video standards are richer than 5DS, and the technology of video shooting should be better than 5DS, while 5DS is facing the market demand of high pixel and high image quality, and video shooting is not the strength of 5DS. 4K is not very popular now, but 4K technology is developing rapidly. You just bought the fuselage, and you can't change it for a year or two. When it becomes popular, you will fall behind. 50 million pixels is a test for Canon's existing lens, that is, some of Canon's top L-heads may not meet the needs of this behemoth at present, and Canon will definitely start to update the lens group in recent years.

There should be a gap. First of all, the pixels are different, so the high sense is not mentioned, but in the case of good light, the estimation effect is similar.

5D3 people don't think it is necessary to buy it, let alone the second generation!

As far as image quality is concerned, there is basically no difference between focusing with the center point and not using commercial advertisements at home.