What camera is better for amateur photography?

Based on your question, I feel like you may be new to this industry.

Let me talk about your supplement first: The reason why I am interested in photography but not in cameras is because the classic scenes are all static and reflected in the form of photos. In addition to recording, do you think it has any other uses? Furthermore, the camera was very difficult to use and I had to hold it up with my hands. How good the camera is. If you have a good scenery, you can take it and fix the memory of the moment.

There are several experts in photo albums, and you must have heard of them. More than 90% of the world's share belongs to those few factories. In terms of the differences between major manufacturers, Nikon mainly uses SLRs. The one you use is consumer grade, so don’t look at Nikon. Sony's in-camera processing is too heavy, but some people like its bright colors. Others are caused by the image processing software inside the camera, not the real colors. Also, everything from Sony has to be supplied separately. Buying domestically produced batteries is not easy to use, it’s too bad, and it costs a lot of money. If you buy a Sony camera, you have to buy Sony's memory card, card reader, battery, data cable, etc.

I prefer Canon, the quality is good, and Canon's colors are based on the concept of reflecting real colors, but it may also be set to "bright" mode through the camera's internal setting options. The price is also cheaper than Sony, and the most important thing is that Canon has a wider range of options.

You are a beginner. I think the recently popular Canon SX200

is quite good, the price is not expensive, the functions are very good, and the appearance is very good. The 6-digit optical zoom is very practical.

Answer completed.