Why don't photographers use Fuji?

Maybe I'm not used to it. Fuji cameras are more expensive.

Fuji is best at film color, color management (development and development), camera lens and coating. In the film era, he made great research and investment in color, and was the only Japanese film company that could compete with Kodak. Optical lenses and coating are more powerful! Carl zeiss T, Fuji EBC and Pentax SMC are called the three world famous films in 1960s and 1970s.

Fuji is the largest optical lens manufacturer in Japan. If he modestly says that he is the second in Japanese optical technology, it is estimated that no one dares to say that he is the first in Japanese optical technology. Several Hollywood 3D digital movie blockbusters, such as Avatar, Journey to the Center of the Earth, Star Wars, Prequel and Bridges of Madison County, were all shot with Fuji Dragon lens.

The larger the image sensor (CCD or CMOS) of a digital camera, the more difficult it is to process and the higher the price. Therefore, large-format photography can only use film. After all, the sensor of a general camera is only as big as a small fingernail, the sensor of a professional camera is only as big as two coins, and the large-format negative is as big as a plate. It is not enough to process such a large piece, even hundreds of thousands.

It's not just ancient costumes. As long as photographers make money by taking portraits, many photo studios on the market also use Canon. Canon and Nikon have their own characteristics in imaging styles, but Canon is more suitable for taking portraits.

First of all, let's talk about the camera recognized by the public for taking portraits. Canon's charm is mainly reflected in its L-class lens, with soft imaging, slightly beautified skin and pink color, so Canon's "charm" comes from this.

Professional or amateur, you can control the equipment you use well, you can make the desired film, you can achieve the expected effect, and you can get social recognition. As for which equipment, it doesn't matter. The equipment is for people. However, there is still some recognition on the equipment. A little attention to the specific brands of equipment used by many professional photographers at the press conference should explain the problem.