The contrast camera is 1. Panasonic HDC-TM900GK 2. Sony HDR PJ50E 3. Sony HDR PJ30E 4. Professional analysis of Sony HDR CX 560.

The main function of Sony PJ series is its own projection function, but personally, I think this song is fun and not practical.

Sony CX700 should be in the same class as Panasonic TM900.

The difference between Sony CX560 and CX550 is that it increases the wide angle, but lacks the electronic viewfinder. It should be an upgraded and simplified version of CX550, which corresponds to Panasonic's TM700! CX560 positioning is a mid-range home model! !

Theoretical parameters have no practical significance! CX700 claims to adopt Sony back-illuminated CMOS, which is called invincible noise control. However, from the actual imaging point of view, the single imaging element of CX700 (the flagship of Sony 2D camera at present) is far inferior to TM900 with 3MOS imaging elements in terms of picture color and clarity. The invincible noise control of CX700 is actually internal noise reduction. Noise control and noise reduction are completely different concepts. Noise control lies in the control of noise, and noise reduction lies in the noise reduction treatment of the noise that has been generated. From the actual performance, the noise reduction trace of the CX700 picture is very serious, which seriously affects the picture quality and clarity! !

Moreover, the price of CX700 in China is not authentic (above 9000), while in Japan, the price of CX700 is lower than that of its previous generation flagship CX550, and the price of CX550 is even lower than that of Panasonic's previous generation TM750! So it is obvious from the perspective of cost performance! !

PJ series and CX560 are not the same model as TM900!

The price of CX700 is too deceptive. From the perspective of cost performance and actual imaging performance, how can Panasonic's TM900 win! ! So there is nothing to worry about. No matter in theory or in actual performance, under the current technical conditions, three imaging elements are always better than a single imaging element, at least until there is no revolutionary technology. This is an iron law! !