Want to shoot baby syrup tablets, Canon 85mm 1.2 or 1.4?

Want to shoot baby syrup tablets, Canon 85mm 1.2 or 1.4? Before answering this question, we need to know why some works are called "sugar water tablets".

Sugar-coated tablets first appeared in scenery shooting, mainly referring to photos that are beautiful but have no profound meaning. In portrait shooting, it mainly refers to glamorous but meaningless photos. In a deeper sense, there is technology without art!

As for shooting such works for babies, actually Canon's 85 1.2 or 1.4 are all competent.

These two shots are representative shots of Canon portraits. To tell the truth, I especially like the 85/ 1.4 lens (maybe I can't afford the 1.2 lens, hehe). Because these two lenses are fixed-focus lenses, the imaging is quite good, the image quality is good, the imaging is sharp and the color is beautiful.

Because of the different aperture, the Jiao Wai of 1.2 is more beautiful, and it is known as a small gas cutting machine. Because of the large aperture, we can shoot easily in low light, and it has a good performance.

Psychologically, I personally think that the resolution of 1.4 version is better than that of 1.2 lens. To be honest, the floating focus of 1.2 is always disturbing.

You can choose according to the money you have prepared. It is reasonable to choose any lens.

The above is my superficial view, and everyone is welcome to comment.

Sword dance images, western photographers, welcome to pay attention.

These two lenses are suitable for the effect you want to shoot sugar water tablets. Shooting sugar water tablets requires not only a lens with a large aperture, but also the distance between the subject and the lens. Simply put, the closer the subject is to the lens, the more obvious the background blur, and the farther the background is from the lens, the more obvious the blur. Don't forget to make the photos as bright and transparent as possible in the later color matching.

Sugar water tablets mainly look at the later stage. Shooting a baby is still the most natural side of being a baby in nature. If you like fixed focus, you can get it with any 85. Even 1.8. The picture below is 70-200. There is no later stage, and it will look better after decades than adding it. Don't trust me. Look at your late photos 20 years ago.

85 1.2 is an old lens with slow focusing speed, erratic focus and serious purple edge! These shortcomings are basically absent in 85 1.4. Although the blur ability of 1.2 is better than that of 65 438+0.4, under the premise of pursuing image quality, such a large aperture is rarely used unless it is used at night to meet the light intake. At this time, 85 1.4 has an advantage because of anti-shake. I think so.

Two portraits can be perfect, and they are called the king of portraits.

It's good enough

The release time of 85 1.2 is a little long, but the aperture should be larger, but there should be no new one yet, right?

85 1.4 has improved a lot compared with the previous generation, and there is also a saying that digital products should be bought new instead of old.

So my recommendation is 85 1.4.

85 1.4 will do.