Wait online. Which is better, Fuji Xt 1 II or Olympus em5?

There is a gap between an APSC and an M43, but the actual shooting doesn't show it (it really doesn't matter). Fujifilm's simulation is not bad compared with ordinary filters, and Oba's direct shot is also good. Moreover, there are also 4000W and 6400W photos with pixel displacement (you can only take still life and landscape artifacts if you want to put them on the shelf), and the focus on Oba is completely successful, and the high sense is not as good as Fuji's. EM52 is still available in ISO 1600.

In addition, Oba is more playable than Fuji, and EM52 has depth of field combined with 4K delayed pixel displacement. Fuji seems to have only film simulation.

Control has its own characteristics. Fuji has a lens aperture ring, a fuselage ISO, a shutter and a Q-key menu, basically without looking at the screen. Oba is a traditional PSMA dial with a unique 2X2 dial control, which can rotate the LCD 270 degrees and focus by touching. Fuji can't do this.

In terms of lens group, Oba can be used with Panasonic M43 lens without switching, and the five-axis anti-shake of the fuselage supports all lenses (including old lenses). At the high end, there are PRO series Dayuan and Panasonic Leica lenses, and the middle and low end are also relatively complete.

Fuji anti-shake, the lens takes the high-end route. Needless to say, Fuji lenses are all bull's heads. We should have both quality and feeling. 1.4 top and constant 2.8 zoom are complete, and the photographer also has the specifications of 56 1.2. APSC has no second one. It can be seen that Fuji is also doing it with his heart. XT 1 is really not suitable for beginners.

Suitable for people who have a full suit as a backup machine.

Snapping and dark focus are not as good as EM52, so it is not suitable for home, travel and children's photography.

For beginners, it is recommended that EM52 and EM52 are both 1600W pixels, which is still a new beginning for XT, but Oba has obviously reached its peak.