Changzhi Pan Zi Ancient Photography

Unfortunately, there is no refuge as you said, at least there is no public existence, because in the foreseeable future, there is no doomsday that can quickly lead to the demise of mankind. At present, all known disasters are either that human beings have mastered the methods of prevention or that their destructive power and influence are limited. Therefore, according to the logic of human society, no one wants to spend a lot of money to run a "permanent investment" that will not play a role, especially in the western political and economic environment, because there are only a handful of countries (including China) in the world that can scrape together enough money to complete this great project, and only China and Russia among these countries have a fairly stable political environment (that is, the ruling party has been in power for a long time, and the national policy has considerable durability and stability). Other big countries are basically standard capitalist democratic systems with separation of powers. The ruling party often "changes dynasties" and the corresponding national policies are constantly changing and aborting. Therefore, as far as the investment income and political influence brought by Noah's Ark Project (my own name) are concerned, it is not suitable for western society and will not even be mentioned in the agenda discussion. They only care about the income of the interest groups they represent, but don't care about the life and death of all citizens and future generations (if this aspect had been taken into account, the environment of the earth would not be so bleak now). To put it bluntly, few people care about what will happen after their death. Human beings are such contradictory creatures.

However, if there are small-scale evacuation measures, such as underground bunkers or bases for government officials to take refuge, they are generally built deep underground, with perfect living facilities and logistics support, but only for military purposes. At best, under the threat of doomsday weapons (such as nuclear weapons), the personal safety of important personnel is temporarily guaranteed. Or in a turbulent social environment (such as coup, mutiny or riots, armed aggression), its significance is to provide a closed space that can resist external crises before effective reinforcements arrive. This protection measure only needs to reserve enough materials in advance, regardless of material recovery, independent supply of energy, preservation of human history and protection of species. Think about it, for a group of short-sighted politicians,

So personally, I don't think any topic you need will appear in this paper, because what you need has never appeared, and it will not appear in the future (at least for a long time). The reason is that the material world outlook and social class system of human beings lead to material being the basis of human existence, so private ownership was born. The birth of private ownership directly led to the emergence of class and primitive trading behavior, and the advanced form of class existence is rights. All kinds of rights constitute the political power necessary for the birth of a country, and the political power with state machines all over the world constitutes the original version of the world today, and this result directly affects the route of human development, so there is today's turbulent world. Throughout today's world, the necessary condition for an ordinary person to become a ruler is that he must have the support of interest groups, because the rights obtained through violence are becoming more and more short-lived and fragile. Only with the support of most people can he achieve long-term "long-term stability", and how can he gain the recognition of most people?

This is the crux of the problem. Even in the highly developed era of modern science and technology, there is a price to pay for communicating with people. To put it bluntly, take the United States as an example: do you know how much it costs to run for president? The answer must be astronomical. How can an ordinary citizen (even if he has a high degree of political consciousness, unprecedented sense of responsibility and unshakable heart of justice) have the money to run for president? There is only one answer, to be the presidential candidate of "two parties" (the two major political parties in the United States actually control everything in the United States in turn). So, why did the two parties choose you as a candidate? Of course, the premise is that you deeply understand and agree with the political program and rules of the game of your party, and you must be responsible for pursuing the interests of the interest groups represented by your party without hesitation. Only the most loyal believers can win the favor of the party's top management and get the party's financial support.

What about the interest groups behind political parties? The answer is not unique. The same is that the government's policy is biased towards itself from the economic or political point of view by inserting pro-members in Congress, which is their "return" for "investing" candidates in advance. Facts have proved that the two parties have occupied an absolute advantage in the seats of the upper and lower houses of the US Congress, and have been continuing this advantage through various means for a long time, so that no political party or group has ever been lucky enough to break through the blockade of the two parties and take the initiative. This is the essence of western democratic society.

Maybe you will refute me, saying that if one day a rich man suddenly has a conscience and decides to be a human public servant who is responsible for future generations and is determined to thoroughly safeguard fairness and justice, and decides to run for president, won't he or she be able to break the "political blockade" between the two parties? The answer is no, let's just say that he (she) has enough economic strength to complete all the campaign activities, but do you know the essence of market economy? You can be rich and afford anything, but only if someone is willing to sell it to you. At present, the mainstream media in the United States are basically manipulated by several major political groups. They use propaganda tools to build momentum for their candidates and try their best to discredit their competitors. They simply won't consider transferring the vital right to speak to someone they don't agree with for this small economic benefit, even if the other party is willing to pay a big price. Without the right to speak, it is impossible for more people to know you, understand you and support your sacred mission, and it is impossible to be concerned in the white-hot election. In fact, this account is very easy to calculate. If the candidate who represents his own interests wins, from the economic point of view, where can the income be calculated?

To say the least, even if he (she) finally sits on the throne of power through various ingenious means, with the help of incredible miracles (though almost impossible), then he (she) still cannot change the established policies and political system of the country, not to mention that various interest groups will use all possible tools in their hands to pressure the president to yield. The U.S. Constitution stipulates that the term of office of a president is four years, with a maximum of two consecutive terms. Then in just eight years, our courageous and glorious president can shake this situation that has lasted for hundreds of years. The United States has written the rules of the game in the Constitution since its birth (from the signing of the Declaration of Independence). They seem to have long realized that under the current human social system, people who "don't represent any interest groups" can't climb the presidency, and those who can sit on it must be "one of their own."

Our only hope is that in the near future, science and technology will be developed enough to make the communication between human beings very concise, efficient and cheap, so that everyone can understand each other's real thoughts at the first time. At that time, all lies will become unnecessary, all information control will cease to exist, and all facts will be presented to everyone completely and objectively. We don't have to worry about being cheated by politicians to get valuable votes. We know who can really take responsibility and who is shirking it. At that time, there will be few misunderstandings and disputes, poverty will be eliminated worldwide, people's life carrier will gradually transition from material existence to spiritual existence, and the concept of state will be completely diluted. The world economy will be harmoniously integrated into various fields in a new form, and all ethnic groups will be fully integrated. Choose an absolute leader who can truly stand the test of history to lead the future of human civilization. Perhaps only then will mankind really seriously consider the "Noah's Ark" project, which is related to the whole species civilization, and be willing to pay enough for this great project to try to avoid the moment of destruction that may have to be faced one day.

Welcome to the communist world of Datong.

These are the ideas I suggest you embody in your paper. In the current world situation, you said that the expected refuge does not exist. Although it is a sad result, it is true. If human beings want to avoid their own destruction, they must first break the shackles that bind their own development. This is a kind of spiritual shackles. I can't concretize this yoke here. After all, I found that this shackle itself is the first challenge on the road of human development.

I hope you can write your thesis in the spirit of integrating into history. Perhaps this is another historical document destined to sink to the bottom of the sea forever, but I believe that if you can feel the persistence and glory of life, there will be a light of prophecy.

I wish you success in your thesis.