What is the difference between micro-single and SLR?

Many new photographers choose their cameras. Will be entangled in whether to choose SLR or micro-single. So what's the difference between micro-single and SLR? In fact, in the eyes of most people, the difference between the two is reflected in three aspects.

First of all, the most important point is that SLR and micro-single have different framing methods. A SLR is a camera that takes a view through a single lens, which means that the photos you finally get in the memory card are the same as those in the viewfinder, and what you see is what you get. Micro-orders are different. Micro-order is not just a micro-order. Compared with SLR, there are fewer reflectors and pentaprism. So the final framing is electronic framing, that is, framing is based on the picture presented on the LCD screen.

Secondly, there are obvious differences in endurance, volume and weight. Micro-single uses electronic framing, so it consumes more power; On the contrary, the endurance of SLR is longer, which is why many outdoor photographers choose SLR. Because the micro-single is smaller, more portable and lighter than the SLR because it lacks the reflector and pentaprism, it is more popular with people who pursue simplicity and portability, such as beginners in photography, people who have strict requirements on objects, sizes and weights, and some women who are sensitive to weight.

Finally, compared with Dan lenses, micro-single lenses are fewer in number and generally more expensive. But SLR is different. SLR can choose more lenses in terms of price and variety. So relatively speaking, photographers who like to use different lenses tend to choose SLR, so there is relatively more room for lens selection and price.

In fact, there is no question of who is good or bad between SLR and micro-single. It is most important to choose the one that suits you best according to your own needs.