Did Peng Yu’s case result in compensation or no compensation? Did Xu Yunhe pay 100,000 in Tianjin’s Peng Yu case?

The parties involved in the Peng Yu case reached a settlement agreement. According to the clear requirements of the settlement agreement, neither the liability nor the amount of compensation shall be disclosed.

On June 16, 2011, the Tianjin Hongqiao District People's Court made a judgment on this matter. Xu Yunhe was sentenced to bear 40% of the civil liability and compensate Mrs. Wang 108,606.34 yuan, including 87,454.8 yuan in disability compensation. .

The judge Xu Yunhe used a three-dimensional reconstruction model to restore the truth of the incident.

Extended information:

At that time, the pressure of public opinion was huge, and the materials provided by the court were pitiful. We invited the most famous orthopedic experts and forensic experts in Shanghai medical circles for consultation. Everyone felt that , it is not easy to restore the truth in this case. "Li Zhengdong recalled, "Teacher Chen led us to sort out three controversial points in the previous case. After eliminating the first two controversial points, we looked for a breakthrough in identification technology for the third key point.

The first is the dispute that the bumper is higher than the knee and the impact is not valid. Chen Yijiu believes that the front of the car will naturally press downwards during emergency braking, and the height will be consistent during impact.

The second issue is the height of the guardrail. Xu Yunhe claimed that the guardrail was "about 1 meter high", so Wang Xiuzhi, who is less than 1.6 meters tall, would easily fall if she tried to cross over. For this reason, Chen Yijiu and other experts went to the site to conduct on-site inspections and found that the height of the guardrail was only 50 centimeters, making it not difficult for Wang Xiuzhi to cross.

Third, was Wang Xiuzhi’s right calf fracture caused by an impact or a fall, or was it caused by a fall after an impact? Chen Yijiu decided to use "virtual anatomy" and "injury biomechanical reconstruction" technologies to restore the truth.

“The core of this technology is to use human body data to build a model of normal state and injury state. By comparing the two, load different injury conditions and simulate the injury formation process.” Although this technology at the time It's still in the scientific research stage, but they decided to give it a try. Li Zhengdong took over the job.

This is a repetitive, long and boring process.

"Fortunately at the time, the hospital saved the CT electronic data of Wang Xiuzhi's legs taken at the time of the incident. These data were very complete and were the key to our three-dimensional modeling. I first built a model of Wang Xiuzhi's right leg. Li Zhengdong said that the model after the injury was constructed, and then the data of the left leg was used to mirror (symmetrically invert) the three-dimensional finite element model of the right leg before the injury.

The next step is to simulate and compare the human body damage process under the action of external forces. "Assumption, verification, denial, hypothesis again, verification again, denial again, we loaded and verified the damage state from different directions and with different amounts of force. We carried out more than 100 loadings before and after, leaving no gray areas in between, and strived to verify the entire verification. The comparison process is complete and leaves no blind spots." Li Zhengdong said that after this process, Wang Xiuzhi's damage simulation gradually became clear.

Based on these complete experimental data, Chen Yijiu made a judgment: Wang Xiuzhi’s fibular head fracture was directly caused by the impact.

"Teacher Chen believes that on the one hand, the location of the injury caused by the fall does not match, and the magnitude of the force does not match the shape of the fall; on the other hand, the image shows an inverted T-shaped fracture of the tibia, which is consistent with the shape of the injury caused by an impact. ." Li Zhengdong said.

Biomechanics has most intuitively simulated the accident scene of the Xu Yunhe case. Its persuasiveness is self-evident, completely avoiding the embarrassment of relying on "empirical judgment" that has been controversial in the past. During the second trial, Chen Yijiu appeared in court in person and presented the biomechanical simulation of the accident scene. Faced with all this, Xu Yunhe was silent...

The court finally ruled that the fact that Xu Yunhe injured Wang Xiuzhi was established. According to their respective As for liability for the accident, Xu compensated Wang with 108,600 yuan.

Reference: People's Daily Online - Who is to blame for the decline of moral indifference in Chinese society?