The same sensors are all one-inch video phones and micro-single, and I don't think anyone can replace anyone.

Now the sensor of the image mobile phone has reached one inch, and many people on the Internet say that it is time to replace the micro-bill, so there is no need to buy the micro-bill in the future. I don't think these people understand the principle of optics, let alone cameras. Due to the limitation of mobile phone thickness, one-inch sensor can only be used on the lens with the equivalent focal length of 12-24cm, and its ideal image quality is between 12-200cm. Beyond this distance, the imaging quality becomes worse and worse, and the micro-single-inch sensor is used in the equivalent focal length of 50-72cm. If you add a zoom lens with an equivalent focal length of 50-200cm, it is necessary to take portraits or landscapes. So I think they have their own advantages in use. The mobile phone is more portable, and it is better to use as a magnifying glass. One-inch micro-single-shot portraits or scenery are better than mobile phones. Because of its powerful processor, the mobile phone is better than the micro-single in ai computing photography and focusing imaging speed, especially in shooting 4k and 8k videos. So I think the two are complementary in shooting images and different scenes, and no one can replace anyone.