Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography major - Why is Freesia Tactics popular in Dylan but not in Esther Yu? Why do you think this is?
Why is Freesia Tactics popular in Dylan but not in Esther Yu? Why do you think this is?
First of all, I personally worked with Esther Yu in reality. At that time, she was not famous and her acting skills were not bad. The main reason is that the characters in that play conform to her personality and look more natural. On the day of the ceremony, no staff member asked her to take pictures, so she said, "I will be angry in the future, and you will regret it." It seems like a joke, but I also believe that she will be angry. Just returned to "Freesia Tactics", her role and I can't have * * * sounds, which is embarrassing and fake. The main reason is that she can't accurately grasp the details. After so many years, her acting skills are still at the same level. Instead of improving, she has actually regressed. What I want to say most is the criticism of the production, because there is nothing to say about the plot, it is really the copied and pasted content. Starting with the scenes and costumes, let's take a look at the contrast environment background, which is relatively monochromatic. This color will give people a feeling of depression visually, which is not transparent enough and has no sense of hierarchy.
Second, then "freesia" is a taboo for actors' clothes. His clothes are actually the same color as the background, and the whole character seems to be stuck on the background wall. No sense of space and three-dimensional sense. How did this appear in the video art picture? This is no different from taking a single frame photo. Let's look at Game of Thrones again. Snow has dyed two-thirds of the environment white, but they are smart that the actors' clothes are black, and the characters are separated from the background at once, so there will be no illusion of being integrated with the environment. And it is not difficult to find that there are green trees in the background in the distance. Once again, it gives the picture a sense of hierarchy, and the whole picture becomes full of space. Although the background behind freesia has a little yellow flowing lines, it is difficult to find a sense of hierarchy in the whole picture. By contrast, it is not difficult to see the illusion that the characters are attached to the background painting. It's really hard to see a person in a position without background level. Figure 1 is like a photo taken by a novice photographer with a camera, but at least you can tell at a glance that it was taken by a professional photographer with a professional camera, let alone that you can't tell.
Third, there is no structure in the background of the play, and the whole background is vague. You can't tell where she is just by looking at this photo. How can you not give it at all? There are still so many people who think the movie is really not good. Maybe you think I didn't pick a good picture when you see it here, so I'll give you a wave of "freesia tactics" that you must think the skyline is beautiful. The three screenshots found in the first episode are good enough to meet your aesthetics. But I ask you, are these three pictures like the feeling when you go to the photo studio and shoot against the background wall? Then, if you look at the last three pictures, it is not difficult to find out whether the picture level, three-dimensional sense, light and shadow effect are more intense and whether the contrast of the pictures is more prominent. Maybe you'll think I'm making a definition. Why does a picture have to have a sense of hierarchy and contrast to make you feel good?
4. If you are still watching freesia after 15 years old, you should improve your aesthetics and taste. Recently, I have always seen reports that "Freesia" is so beautiful that it can't be filmed. The picture is really made by conscience, and the boasted chicken feathers are going to heaven. I don't blame you if you are under fifteen. After all, you are still young and your aesthetics have not been cultivated. You have been led astray by those girls' film and television dramas, and you don't know what is beauty and what is man for a while. But if you go to high school, go to college and cheer for this kind of drama outside the society, then I really doubt your aesthetics. I think today's audience has experienced the longest day in Chang 'an, and works such as On Earth can improve their aesthetics and know what is a good domestic film and television drama and what is a film and television drama worthy of applause. The result is another sigh! In fact, I don't want to comment on the plot of freesia, because the crude plot is quite bloody, which is no different from the previous similar film and television dramas. I just want to put aside the plot and talk about freesia.
A truly elegant person will not show disdain for beggars. Can't you criticize less and see more? Besides, freesia formula is very good in my heart. Not what you like, but what I like. This is really too much. People are a little sweet drama, and the production cost is there. It's ridiculous to have to follow the big ip. Besides, it has its advantages to explode fire among passers-by. At the same time, agarwood was sprayed badly. Why can freesia tactics receive rave reviews? In fact, the early and late plots are good. Although there are some romantic routines, it is a cool drama after all, and it is very good to make it like this. In the middle section, in the sea of Cangyan, when the woman and the man changed bodies, the woman was really stupid and sweet. This story is really retarded, which makes me very angry.
This woman's character has completely turned into an ancient Marisu woman, knowing that a slight mistake would lead to a bad end, but she still bravely went on being stupid and continued to be stupid. I'm not saying that the play is not good, but it's still very good on the whole. But in the mid-term, this really pulled a lot of points. It looks really silly now. I finished reading it while spitting. But you can't ignore the time and space background of this plot to evaluate it. The original work of this play is a work ending in 15. At that time, it was not a work without IQ, but what was the mainstream of romance should probably be felt. If you don't know, you can search the 20 14 leaderboard. The original situation was actually IQ.
- Previous article:What is the spittoon lens?
- Next article:Who can tell me what's interesting about Shouguang?
- Related articles
- I saw the job of porter in Chifeng. I want to ask what this job is and is it promising?
- Movies about bears
- Photography Xia Qing
- Can you stand this "moral poison"? Depth evaluation of 37.4 megapixel street sweeping artifact Zeiss ZX 1
- Queen of photography: exploring Jenny's road to black powder fashion photography
- Li Guowei's Role Introduction
- Why do aerial surveys use five lenses?
- Is it true that Xi Anshenglang Culture Media Co., Ltd. recruits part-time jobs?
- Introduction of Ice and Snow Sports Rural Tourist Attractions Ice and Snow Sports+Tourism
- The diversity story of Chloe's global tour