Never judge anyone's aesthetics.

For images, aesthetics is a hard-core concept for everyone, but when one's own aesthetics is put on other people's works, it becomes a very illusory concept at the same time. Why? I think this reason should start from the role of aesthetics.

What is aesthetics and what is its use? When people see beautiful things, they secrete dopamine, which makes them feel happy. I think this dopamine secretion is aesthetic. After being stimulated by the same image for many times, they no longer secrete dopamine, and they are tired of aesthetics, just like Beijing roast duck, which will vomit if they eat it continuously. An aesthetic significance is put forward here, that is, people are cool, and the conditions that can make people cool are different, so this is where everyone's aesthetics are different. The same photo can make Party A feel good and Party B feel good, but there is no way to make Party B feel good. So you think this photo is meaningful and beautiful? Obviously, from the perspective of both parties, this photo is meaningful and beautiful, because it makes them secrete dopamine, but this photo is meaningless and not beautiful enough for Party D, because they don't secrete dopamine, so they feel bad. So is this photo beautiful or not? There is obviously no absolute answer to this. Only answers with domains exist. So when we see a photo that doesn't look good, we must be clear in our hearts that this photo doesn't make you cool, but it doesn't mean it doesn't make others cool. At least he made the photographer happy, or the subject happy, in fact, the meaning of this photo was achieved. You don't need to cater to most people's aesthetics, let alone yours. You know, you are just an individual, you don't mean everything, and you can't mean everything. No one can represent everything and no one is qualified to define beauty. Perhaps the truth is that the more authoritative people think a photo looks good, others will think it looks good. Even if they are not allowed to secrete dopamine, they are still duplicitous and say it looks good. This is not a coincidence, it is inevitable. Most people in our society follow the trend, and most of them are mediocre people. Therefore, don't be silly to think that most people don't think it is beautiful, then it is not beautiful, not beautiful. I just want to say that most people are a fart. Most people brush Tik Tok Aauto faster, so do you think it makes sense to brush that thing? Most people don't exercise. Do you think most people are right? Besides, there are several people around you. What qualifications do you have to express opinions on behalf of most people? . And most people are still a fart, don't because most people think what is right and what is good. Because it's childish and ridiculous.

Every photo has its meaning. Even taking a shit has its meaning. Maybe this shit is important to photographers. If you are not a photographer, you are not qualified to evaluate this work. None of us is qualified to judge whose work. If you insist on evaluation, please add domain. You can say that in the aesthetic requirements of a company, this action is not allowed and does not meet the requirements of the company. There is no problem in saying this, but you can't use your aesthetics to deny each other's works. I know this truth, so I will appreciate other people's works when I see them. Even if it is a photo taken by a novice who is very amateur in technical analysis, I still respect it, because the significance of this photo to the photographer, in my opinion, is to help him make this attempt. This photo is a stepping stone to the growth of photographers. So although it can't make me feel very cool, it is very meaningful to the person who filmed it.

Not only photography, but also retouching. From a technical point of view, no matter how bad the picture is, as a teacher, you are not qualified to belittle others. Don't think you have an aesthetic advantage. What you are qualified to say is to stand in a limited area and express your objective views, because you don't know what this picture has brought to the retoucher. Maybe he just wants to express his inner anxiety with such a poor texture. As long as he repairs it himself, this photo is meaningful to him. If it is for the customer, as long as the customer feels satisfied and cool, it is meaningful. You are not qualified to judge other people's works or customers' aesthetics with your own aesthetics. Aesthetics is so subjective and emotional that everyone's aesthetics are almost different. So you can analyze objectively, but don't judge subjectively.

If you see anyone coming up in the future, talk about aesthetics, stay away from him and don't waste a minute on him. Because he doesn't even know these truths. The level is doomed to be low. I'm confused.