How to distinguish the quality of photographic works

The first is to look at the photographic composition. The standard is to analyze whether this photographic work conforms to the conventional composition method. If it does not meet the requirements, it will be ruled out directly (except for individual photographers, which should not be considered by ordinary photographers). Although those who meet the standards fall into the stereotype, they are enough for us to imitate and learn for decades. Aesthetically speaking, the composition should be beautiful, generous, novel and full of visual impact, which can attract people's attention at once. If the composition has no impact, it can hardly be called a good photographic photo.

The second is to look at the tone of photography. Let's start with color photography. If the colors are rich and bright, and the cold and warm are properly matched, it is a good photographic work, otherwise it is a work with color problems. Black and white photos, the tone contrast should be obvious.

The third is to highlight the main body. What a photographic work wants to express must have a clear theme. If the theme is not prominent, or there are many messy themes, it will make people feel that you don't know what you want to express. In movie terms, it is not clear who is the leading role and who is the supporting role. At the same time, the background should be concise and not miscellaneous, which makes people feel particularly chaotic. For example, I often see some photographers taking pictures of beautiful women, and a few extras will pop up around.