Which is better, the wreath at the foot of the mountain or Changjin Lake?

Who's good and who's bad? Just compare them!

Two films, Gao Hechang, one is adapted from a novel of the same name and the other is written by a famous screenwriter. The directors of the films are all famous actors, and the high director is Xie Jin. The director of Dragon is also the director of famous martial arts films and action films. There is no famous name among the actors in Gao, although Mr. Tang Guoqiang, the actor of Zhao Mengfu, is very popular now, and he was troubled by "Butter Boy" at that time. The actors in "Dragon" are all red and purple, old bones, and little fresh meat. If the actresses don't live up to expectations, it is estimated that a few people will make a fuss.

"Gao" is just a war film, and it is one of the films that reflect the counterattack against Vietnam. Always hold high the banner of patriotism and seize the moral high ground.

"Gao" is said to be good so far, and it is the only film with the same theme that has a high evaluation. "Dragon" snapped up "2 billion" a few days ago, and many media comments were the "ceiling" of domestic war films.

From the content point of view, the characters in Gao's works are full and three-dimensional, with flesh and blood. Liang Sanxi: Serious and responsible, dedicated to the company and selfless dedication. Jin Gloria: Simple, honest and frank, strong sense of justice, love home, love wife and love children. Zhao Mengsheng is spoiled. Xiaojin is simple, honest and hardworking. "Little Beijing" is a young cadre with a dream of being a general, and the top and backbone of the army is in sharp contrast with Zhao Mengsheng. Yu Xiu, Sanxi's mother, and even the village cadres and families of martyrs passing by seem to be real. The story is interlocking, foreshadowing, ups and downs, explaining, scattered but clear.

"Dragon" just made up a few stories, and it ended as soon as it was installed in the movie according to the timeline.

Why do you say that? From the beginning of the movie. It can be seen that imitating Rambo's "The First Blood" to visit his comrades-in-arms is generally depressing. Even parents have no joy in the process of their son talking about building a house in the future, just like an outsider, which is incompatible with the jubilant environment in which the people turned over to be masters of the country in the early days of liberation.

Imitate the beginning of First Blood, no problem. But imitation learning requires "knowing why, knowing why better". After the Vietnam War, the US military retreated because of its military disadvantage, and the soldiers returned to China. Instead of being unpopular, there were accusations everywhere. Soldiers who fought for their country were denounced by the people, which made them confused, angry and unwilling. "The First Blood" was depressed from the beginning to the outbreak, so Rambo's condemnation and handcuffing in the last scene gave people a shock and thought. How did a good soldier who was full of feelings and fought for the country become a prisoner of the country?

Gao also showed the excellent officers and men of our army, so when they were killed, the audience were extremely worried. Many students subconsciously clenched their fists when they didn't give Jin Gloria a a reward. If that person really appears in front of them, it is estimated that nine and a half out of ten people will look for him pk.

Does the dragon feel this way? Why? Because our literary and art workers have such a misunderstanding: they always want to write heroes as ordinary people. I don't want to think that ordinary people can defeat the American army with the conditions of volunteers? Without firm will, spirit of sacrifice and noble feelings, can ordinary people persist? I should be a deserter!

This kind of person is not unheard of. During the epidemic, how many people fled abroad first and then fled back.

What everyone likes to say when playing games: look down on life and death, and do it if you refuse to accept it. Really, are we sure we can do it then? Anyway, only a few people in the video saved people in the water, and a large group of people watched it on the shore. It is not that our people are unkind and not enthusiastic, but that it is difficult for us ordinary people to die peacefully.

Like the volunteers, they suffered so much and sacrificed so many people that they didn't even leave their surnames and names. Is this unfair to ordinary people?

Even foreigners are saying that China is well protected by her excellent people. If we refuse to recognize the Excellence of our protectors, we protected people will be ungrateful.

Let me tell you a common misunderstanding in film and television reviews:

Early movies rarely reflect the cruelty of war, and it seems that few people died in a big war, so it is a drama.

In fact, as we all know, most of those filmmakers came out of the war. Will they not know the cruelty of war? They don't show it in the camera because they don't want to sacrifice their real comrades on the screen again.

Remember the ending of Shangganling? Seven ragged soldiers in the bullet hole war.

A few minutes ago, the ugly and simple-minded gunner Mao Hayes who handed out the squirrel with a smile disappeared; It was announced all the way: the small step speaker left in the 5 th and 4 th districts; The man shouted, "Let the people of the motherland hear the news of our victory!" " "Handsome guys are gone, those. . . . . . Sorry, I can't write any more.

What is a ceiling? This is the ceiling. Many times before, we did use it: this is a story, this is a story to comfort ourselves, so that we feel that the people who died in the movie are not so sorry.

At this moment: this movie! Defending movies is different.

Similarly, some people try to treat our volunteers as ordinary people, but they put themselves on the altar.

I want to say: even Mao has stepped down from the altar. Who else is qualified to stay there and not express their opinions? Blue dragon? Jason Wu? Or tsui hark?

Aside from investment, the drama "Gao" is even better-

"Garland under the Mountain" tells the story of a dude who experienced the baptism of Vietnam's counterattack battlefield and his personality was sublimated.

Like the Battle of Changjin Lake, the story is set in the war in New China, which is particularly sensitive. This kind of film can only be shown at certain times.

Compared with the two films, from the storyline, the height of the drama is much better than that of the drama lake, and the changes of the characters' thoughts, the particularity of the years and the pain brought by the war are all in place.

The drama "Gao" made no secret of the defects of the times and boldly embodied various contradictions, which was very rare at that time. Based on Li Cunbao's novel of the same name, the film has successfully created a number of characters with different personalities, such as Zhao Mengsheng, Liang Sanxi and Jin Kailai. They have stood the test in the war of blood and fire, and their noble qualities are to defend their country and serve the country and the people wholeheartedly. The story is tense, vivid and thought-provoking.

The plot of "Lake" is relatively light, without too many ups and downs and reversals. It is to use "fighting" as the main means to attract attention and get traffic.

Compared with the two actors, the acting skills of a group of actors in Gao exploded. Some people say that many actors in Lake are also acting schools. Here, whether an actor can play well depends mainly on the director's design and story. The plot is so bad that it is difficult for the actors to play their acting skills.

Compared with investment, of course, the lake is the highest. But the price/performance ratio is not necessarily. At that time, making movies was all about passion and consciousness. Nowadays, making movies often depends on the flow of actors and funds, which is incomparable.

You can also see the level of scores. High 9.4 points, Lake 7.6 points. Gao dares to expose shortcomings. The more flawed the times are, the more shortcomings the characters have. In the face of the Great Patriotic War, the more they can devote themselves bravely, the more they can show the brilliance of human nature. This strong contrast has brought great shock to the audience. On the other hand, the play "Lake" is only brave, dare not expose its shortcomings, and does not have enough power to impress the audience. "Gao" should be released now, and it is estimated that it will not pass the trial. "Lake" was put in the past, but it was not as profound as movies such as "Triumph at Midnight" and "Proud Mother" at that time.

Gao Shen's plot can stand scrutiny, but Lake has many loopholes. For example:

A child who stops the chief car can enter the main battle force with a sharp knife and join the battlefield without training. There are so many people in a legion, and there are also many soldiers to take care of, right? Aren't you afraid of procrastination and making the company suffer more losses? In fact, this was arranged by the director forcibly, in order to show brotherhood on the battlefield.

"Gao" expresses patriotism and changes in people's thoughts, while "Hu" only expresses patriotism, with different contents and depths. The music of "Lake" is not memorable, touching or exciting, which is also a big bug.

New China's war movies are strictly censored, and whether they can be released depends on the political environment at that time. I hope more in-depth movies like "The Garland under the Mountain" can be made in China, so that we can think deeply while remembering the patriotic education of the protagonist.

I wish you all a happy movie!

I burst into tears when I watched "Garland under the Mountain". The characters and contradictions in the play were vividly described, but when I finally went to the battlefield, I disappeared with a smile. Liang Sanxi and Jin Kailai died one after another, and Zhao Mengfu, the son of Zhao, also grew into a war hero in the battle.

And the battle of Changjin Lake is far away from it. The war scenes made with a lot of special effects can only be said to be too fake. In the description of characters, except for Lei Gong, there are some characteristics, and the psychological characteristics of other characters can't be shown at all. The biggest feature is that the plot is protracted and lively, that's all!

So as far as the emotional power of the play is concerned, Garland at the foot of the mountain fell 18 blocks in the battle of Changjin Lake.

From their respective purposes, the mountain is thoughtful, taking the classic road, and the long one is a commercial film.

Is the wreath at the foot of the mountain as deep as the movie The Battle at Lake Changjin? Little Beijing's sacrifice was to expose the chaos of China's military industry after WG at that time. Jin Gloria's sacrifice was actually because the medal was cancelled by cutting sugar cane, and if there were more people in China who told the truth and did practical things like Jin Gloria, the country would be prosperous. Dare you say it now? Did Liang Sanxi's mother and wife show their attitude towards soldiers and the country in Changjin Lake? Although they have a low level of education and little knowledge, how many people can achieve their attitude in the face of the issue of right and wrong? Zhao Mengfu's transformation and sublimation is the process of seeing a China man stand the test of blood and fire on the battlefield. Of course, what moved me most was Liang Sanxi's debt. Zhao Mengsheng found that he owed money, so he sold his beloved camera to collect money, and then told everyone not to tell the company commander's family, but Liang Sanxi's mother took out the wrapped 620 yuan IOUs, because these IOUs were mentioned in Liang Sanxi's suicide note to Yu Xiu. He said that if he sacrificed his country, gave him a 550 yuan pension, and then sold his pigs, he would be able to pay back the debt. These were soldiers in China at that time, and their images were vivid. Changjin Lake is great, but it's too heroic to be known as a wreath. I will be very excited after reading Changjin Lake, but after reading the wreath, it seems that there is a big stone on my chest, and there will be a lot of reflection. Maybe this is the difference.

Why should we compete? The shooting background and age are different. Is it comparable? Can you compare jy between fei chang and Li Kui? This kind of problem is really insidious, forcibly comparing two excellent domestic war movies to achieve the despicable goal of holding one and stepping on two.

Simply put, two films with different backgrounds, different artistic styles and different shooting times cannot be compared.

I have seen both the novella and the movie "Garland under the Mountain", and I was very moved at that time. But comparing this film with the current battle of Changjin Lake, I really don't know its meaning and intention. !

This is a film from 30 to 40 years ago. At that time, there was a plot of individual cadres' children "going through the back door" before the war. This may be something that some people plagiarize this film and want to hint but dare not say. To tell the truth, please don't "make" it. Don't forget that the heroic sacrifice of the princeling "Little Beijing" in the film also moved us. In reality, there are not a few children of cadres who died heroically and fought bloody battles in the Vietnam War. You don't have the guts to say it directly. Aren't you tired of innuendo and catching shadows here? !

As a person who came from that era, I want to tell netizens and children that in any era, there are "well-known" people who regard anti-mainstream as independent thinking. These people seem to be "smart", but in fact they are stupid. Don't be fooled by them.

On the other hand, whether you watch the Battle of Changjin Lake or not, you can really watch A Garland under the Mountain when you have time, which is very touching. After reading it, your hearts will naturally make their own judgments.

Garland under the Mountain is the best film in China's film history. No one, no matter what the theme is, is the first!

The movie "Garland under the Mountain" is very touching. I read this story written by Li Cunbao in the newspaper and watched a movie. I have a deep memory and still miss Liang Sanxi. He should have asked for family leave to go back to his hometown to see the newborn child. Because the counterattack against Vietnam was about to begin, he took the initiative to stay.

In a battle, at the moment when the enemy bullets came, he kicked off his comrades-in-arms and died.

And on the way to the army, his mother and lover walked for a few days with their young children in their arms to save money, in order to pay back the debts owed by Liang Sanxi early.

Also, Liang Sanxi's wife came to visit Liang Sanxi's grave with her child in her arms. NianLia, this child doesn't understand yet. Under the monument is her father who hasn't called yet.

When Liang Sanxi's lover received his relics, the violinist was the only toy he left for his children.

Also, Liang Sanxi's wife wants to pay off the debts he owed to his comrades-in-arms before his death. It took her 1 1 year to pay it back.

Also, the wife of the officer who flew into a rage and took Commander Thor to the front from the back door. ...

All these, touching shots, are deeply left in the memory. This is the success of this work. It is a touching masterpiece.

The battle of Changjin Lake is an epic and glorious work. No doubt, I like it too.

The wreath at the foot of the mountain is the ceiling of domestic movies. What does Changjin Lake want to express? It's not that there is no comparability without understanding a level.