What is the function of Fibonacci helix in camera?

The function of Fibonacci spiral in camera: constructing perfect composition with Fibonacci proportion.

Are you a detail-oriented person? If you are a photographer, the best answer is. Understanding the trisection is an important milestone for any photographer. Suddenly, you realize that in the previous photo, the subject was placed in the middle of the picture because the focus was there. That makes sense, doesn't it? Trigonometry takes you to a new height in photography, putting the subject in the top, bottom or left and right third of the picture. But wouldn't it be boring if all the photos had only one composition? Admittedly, this skill has a certain effect, but how about learning another equally effective skill?

The proportion of people entering Fibonacci

Fibonacci ratio, also known as Phi or golden section, was discovered by Leonardo Fibonacci around AD 1200. He noticed that this proportion appeared in a large number in nature, and the natural structure design based on it was both practical and beautiful. From then on, there was the nickname golden section.

Since the Renaissance, artists and architects have widely used the ratio of 1: 1.6 18 in their works. This proportion can be found in famous works of art such as the Parthenon, Mona Lisa and The Last Supper, and it is still in use today. The golden section has been used by Apple for its product design, Twitter for its page design, and all major companies in the world have adopted it in their logo design. There is not much discussion about this in the photography circle, because it is a somewhat advanced composition method that many people can't understand. It's much simpler just to say the dichotomy, so direct, accurate and easy to use.

Fibonacci proportion is not a complicated mathematical concept. This is a practical composition method, which is adopted by famous artists, architects and Fortune 500 companies in history. For photography, the composition created by this ratio conforms to the aesthetic standards of human subconscious. Draw a straight line from the four points of Fibonacci proportion, and you will find a grid line similar to the trichotomy. But if you look closely, you will find that this is not an accurate three-point line. Now the picture scale is not1:1:kloc-0/,but 1:0.6 18: 1. Here are some examples:

In the picture above, I put the left eye of the slightly dominant horse at the intersection of grid lines. Imagine if I use a three-point grid line here, the horse's head will be crowded on the left side of the picture. In this photo, the horse's head is not in the center of the picture, nor is it crowded on both sides. This is the right place, do you agree? Look at another example:

This photo is a little different. If you are really a detail-oriented person, you will find that there are no grid lines here. In this photo, I put the head of the model on the spiral line and let his left eye be on the node. Ok, let's continue:

In this key

In West's photo, I arranged the horizon on a grid line. In my opinion, it is too obvious to arrange the horizon according to the trichotomy, leaving a little more space for the unimportant parts. In this photo, the sky and clouds are perfect, the church is on the right and the famous Duval Street is on the left. If the composition of the sky is more, the audience will think that the sky is the protagonist of the picture.

In this example, I use Fibonacci grid lines many times. I put the gate between two vertical lines, and the top is just above a horizontal line. This leaves just the right space for the ceiling and guides the audience's line of sight to the gate. Here are some examples to see if you can imagine the grid lines and consider why you want to compose them like this.

abstract

I hope my answer can give you some inspiration. Fibonacci proportion is a powerful tool for composition, and it can't be ignored as a close relative of trichotomy. Although their grid lines look very similar, sometimes using Phi can make photos that feel wrong completely different. Of course, I'm not saying that the dichotomy is useless in photography, but Phi is more advanced and has been proved by historical tests.