This is an unprofessional camera used to shoot a movie. Please analyze and help.

Let me give you the answer: 1. You have to understand that using such a camera can only be used to shoot video films with plot content. From a professional point of view: it is a TV-type video. As for the filming of the movie, although the results are all video clips, they were not shot with the same cameras used to shoot television. Due to its special requirements in various aspects, it is necessary to use a special camera for filming movies. The reason why I mention this first is to tell you that there is no need to stick to this at all. The camera you mentioned will suffice to meet your requirements. Second, you need to figure out the pixel problem. Let me tell you this is a simple yet complex question. Because it is complicated to understand from a professional perspective. If we explain it from common sense: it is a question of how many points a picture consists of. This pixel refers to a picture, a still picture. Therefore, it is generally based on the performance indicators of the camera. For cameras used to shoot dynamic material, the professional indicator uses line elements (that is, vertical and horizontal linear). In fact, the two meanings are similar, but what is the difference between them? As far as the picture is concerned: the result taken by the camera is a single picture. Regardless of whether it is used for screen display or printed on photo paper, the result is determined by the density of the dot matrix (that is, pixels) that makes up the picture. Clear and blurry. In this way, the more dots (the higher the pixels), the clearer the picture will look. The camera captures dynamic images. Whether it is the beginning of shooting or the final display. It's all calculated in frames (that's what people see). What this means here is that when people see the vivid picture captured by the camera on the screen, it is not a single painting like the one captured by the camera. Rather, it is a phenomenon in which more than 24 frames of images pass by in front of people's eyes in one second. Therefore, it is necessary to measure the vertical and horizontal linearity used in scanning each frame to determine its clarity and blur. To put it simply, when people draw a sketch on a piece of paper, they use horizontal and vertical lines to create a white tone effect (the more horizontal and vertical lines intersect, the more symmetrical the picture will be). Therefore, a camera is different from a camera in that it uses linear parameters to measure its image indicators. But now we also talk about cameras in terms of pixels. This is not contradictory, because: the more lines intersect, the more intersection points will be generated; and the more intersection points, the more pixels will be generated. Therefore, in this sense, there is no contradiction. 3. The two machines you compared are both good. But in terms of application, I still recommend "Sony NEX-VG30E". Because its 11x optical zoom alone is superior to the second model in terms of performance (it can provide you with a little more expressiveness in the focal length when shooting). The rest depends on your own orientation. As far as the impact of the camera on the picture, I will give you this opinion.