Why do some people now question the US moon landing fraud?

The difficulty of landing on the moon is not how to get up, but how to return to the earth. This is the focus of debate on whether the American landing on the moon is false. Those who support the successful landing of the United States on the moon like to put aside the issue of returning to earth and are unwilling to analyze the issue of returning in detail.

I believe that Saturn V rocket in the United States can launch people from the earth to the moon. That's because Saturn V rocket with a height of 1 10 meters has enough propulsion, but please don't miss a detail. The giant Saturn V rocket was built by thousands of ground workers on the earth in a few days. On the moon, it is impossible for two or three astronauts to return to Earth to build a launcher in just one day. Some people may say that the gravity of the moon is only one-sixth of that of the earth, and there is no need for the Saturn V rocket with a height of 1 10 to return. The problem is that the orbital speed of the earth is 7.9 kilometers per second, and the orbital speed of the moon is also 1.68 kilometers per second. This speed is almost the speed of the V2 missile. It is conceivable that on the earth, it is difficult for two or three people to build a V2 missile with a height of 10 meter or more by relying on various jib tools, let alone put a return capsule as big as V2 missile in a spacesuit on the moon with bad conditions!

In a word, the authenticity of Americans landing on the moon is still in doubt. The Soviet Union was also studying the moon landing plan at that time, but it ended in failure, dragging down the national strength!

Many people first question the technical feasibility. China has only launched a lunar probe now. How could the United States put a man on the moon decades ago? Why is Saturn V, which sent Apollo spacecraft to the moon, no longer made? Why did the United States stop going up after landing on the moon six times? Why don't you give us proof every year?

In short, on the issue of money, at that time, the United States devoted all its efforts to the whole country, investing $25.5 billion for 1 1 year, and the number of participants reached 300,000. It sent 12 astronauts to the moon in six times, which is a feat of human conquest of space.

Can NASA play once a year to prove that the moon landing is real? American taxpayers' money is not so easy to fool. It is not easy for Hollywood to organize hundreds of thousands of people to participate in the performance of the studio on earth.

As for some specific problems of Apollo landing on the moon, such as the flying of the national flag and the return of manned people, there has been a lot of evidence to verify and there is no specific explanation. Even the national aeronautics and space administration of the United States no longer responded to this, but published more than 8,000 photos of astronauts landing on the moon on the Internet. You can go and see them when you have time.

Since Apollo landed on the moon, the outside world has never stopped questioning its authenticity, and various evidences have been listed to try to prove that Apollo landed on the moon is false.

For example, watching the video of Apollo landing on the moon, we can see that the American flag inserted on the surface of the moon has been flying in the wind. They think there is a vacuum on the moon, so there can be no wind and the national flag can't fly in the wind. Therefore, it is questioned that Apollo's landing on the moon was filmed in the studio of the earth.

There is no wind on the moon. When the national flag is planted, it droops naturally, and the photos taken are not good-looking. The national flag designed by aerospace engineers has one more crossbar than the ordinary national flag, which can be stretched.

When astronauts spread the national flag and insert it into the lunar soil, the flagpole will shake. Objects shaking in a vacuum will keep vibrating for a long time because there is no air damping.

There are many similar problems, such as there are no stars in the sky photographed on the moon and astronauts have two shadows, etc., but these problems are equally reasonable on the moon and cannot prove that there is no moon landing.

On the contrary, the evidence to prove the success of landing on the moon is very sufficient.

1969, the first man landed on the moon. 1969- 1972, from Apollo 1 1 to Apollo 17, humans successfully landed on the moon for six times, and 12 astronauts landed on the surface of the moon.

Six moon landings collected 382 kilograms of moon rocks and soil. Ouyang Ziyuan and other China scientists studied Apollo samples, and 0.5 grams of lunar rock was preserved and exhibited in the Beijing Planetarium. It is found that Apollo samples are different from rocks and soil on earth.

During the landing on the moon, laser mirrors and a large number of scientific instruments placed on the moon received a lot of scientific data, and later studies confirmed that these data were indeed measured on the moon.

Since the 20th century, countries around the world, including China, Japan, the United States and India, have conducted more than ten lunar explorations, and the resolution of remote sensing images of the whole moon has reached 0.5m From these high-resolution photos, we can find traces of the lunar module, lunar rover and even wheels passing by.

So far, no one in the world who is engaged in lunar science research doubts the authenticity of Apollo's landing on the moon.

If you still don't believe me, I suggest you have a chance to go on a field trip. The traces of Apollo landing on the moon can be preserved for thousands of years.

Apollo astronauts landing on the moon photos. Traditional lunar rover and lunar module are still on the moon. Please note: the crossbar on the flag and the black sky. In fact, China's Chang 'e-3 probe photographed the sky on the moon without stars.