Nikon d100 I am a poor student and want to buy this. I saw it for sale in the same city. The condition is pretty good. It comes with 28-85. The asking price is 2300. Is it worth it?

The price is pretty good, but the key point is that the quality is pretty good, which is a very vague concept. I can only tell if there are photos.

D100 has a body motor, but the gap between d100 and d200 is really too big. From a practical point of view, buying an s3pro can completely surpass it (except for the weak battery), including d50 and d200. The body functions of d70s are not worse than d100. Of course, d70s is more expensive, the price of 50 is about the same.

It would be a tragedy to use the 2885 lens, because there is no wide angle and it is very frustrating to use. The market price of this lens is 800-1000. It is better to replace it with a second-hand 1870 lens. It is only one or two hundred more. The wide angle is much more convenient. Overall The quality is also great (the 3 EDs are not fake), and the focus is almost noise-free. There is really no reason to choose the 2885, unless you still have a film body.