The difference between a studio and a studio

I disagree with what you said upstairs. It depends on what kind of studio you choose. Generally, the studio will be more traditional, and rigid movements and postures are the shortcomings of the studio. Because it is not a one-on-one service, a photographer has to shoot n couples, and the shooting time is limited. He won't have that much time to adjust your expression, so he just needs to pose.

In addition, there are limitations in choosing a photo studio. A friend and I analyzed why it seems that the photo studio is more expensive than the photo studio. One is, of course, the invisible consumption of the studio is very strong, and the other is the problem of scenic spots. In principle, the studio can shoot any scenic spots and feelings you want, because it is one-on-one. But the studio can only be confined to his own module base. For example, if you go to Venus and say you want to shoot Taiping Temple, how much do you think he charges?

For the post-80s and post-90s young people, if they want to make more personalized films (not the so-called theme clothes in the studio), they feel very trendy, so it is definitely much better to choose the studio.

That's right. The mode of the studio is to sell themes, one theme is fixed, and the clothes and hairstyles are fixed. Whether you are suitable or not, it is the same, so the similarity between the studio and others is too strong. Also compare two friends shooting in the same studio. Apart from different faces, we have seen movies. Basically, they are all the same, and there must be more identical ones. So if you want wedding photos to be more personalized and have your own style, you can choose a photo studio.