Which is better, JVC JY-HM95 or Sony HXR-MC2500?

The question you asked was what I wanted to know, but no one made it clear. No one may own two machines at the same time, so it is impossible to compare them. I have Sony 2500 in my hand now, and I have used it for more than half a year. I want to change it into JVC JY-HM95, but I don't want to pay this price. If I buy JVC JY-HM95 at the same time, I think it is a waste and unnecessary. Theoretically, JVC JY-HM95 should be Bisogni 2500, with sensors, lens aperture and aperture. JVC JY-HM95 is bigger than Bisogni 2500, so the picture quality should be better. However, in terms of sales volume, Sony 2500 is bigger and more people buy it. In terms of praise, JVC JY-HM95 scored higher, with the former 3. 1 and the latter 4.7. From the dealer's mouth, they all say the same thing, and they can't say who is good or bad. People who don't use cameras professionally are actually invisible, and many of them have to practice to know. Judging from the purchase evaluation, JVC JY-HM95 performs very well in low illumination. From various data analysis, I also prefer JVC JY-HM95. In fact, if there is little difference between the two cameras, most people can't see it, and only professional users can understand it. If the effect of the two cameras is not very different, then the decisive factor of the shooting effect is people, not machines. If only from the perspective of image quality, both models can be used. Under Sony 2500 HD, color reproduction is still very positive. If I prefer JVC JY-HM95 in terms of application function, dual card and dual power supply will be much more convenient. If possible, I want to buy JVC JY-HM95 to try. In my experience, if you pay attention to color, you should buy Sony 2500. If you pay attention to clarity, JVC JY-HM95 should be better. Generally speaking, there is not much difference between the two modes.