Photographic equipment problems, seek expert access, help answer! Tuli 16-28 f 2.8+ Nikon 70-300VR or Nikon 16-35 f4?

Personal experience, or recommend the original lens, DZP price is really high, can save money, wide-angle I still recommend Nikon 16-35 f4. Some people have asked similar questions at Nikon Bar, and I have answered similar questions based on my personal experience (/f? ct=335675392。 baiduPostBrowser & ampsc= 15394937950。 z= 1282459209)

For 16-35/f4 VR:

1, aperture: If you focus on landscape photography, the demand for shallow depth of field brought by a large aperture should not be very strong, so there is little difference between the maximum aperture of 4 and 2.8.

2, the price: 16-35/4VR 8k or so, which is worthwhile compared with the imaging effect.

3. Appearance: 16-35 Like most Nikon lenses at present, although it is a gold ring lens, the metal texture is not so strong, and as a G lens, 16-35 cancels the aperture ring design.

4. Zoom design: The zoom design of 16-35 can also be regarded as an internal zoom design. Although the internal lens barrel will stretch back and forth for a short distance, the overall external length of the lens will not change.

5. Lens group structure: From the lens group structure, 16-35VR is 12 group 17 lens, 2 ED lenses and 3 aspheric lenses.

6. Coating technology: It should be noted that 16-35 adopts nanocrystalline coating, which can effectively inhibit the reflection between mirrors, improve the lens luminous flux and enhance the contrast and resolution. Compared with Nikon's previous multilayer coating, nanocrystalline coating is more prominent in suppressing reflection than previous super coating.

7, anti-shake: 16-35/4VR This lens is equipped with Nikon VR II anti-shake components, which can provide anti-shake effect of about 4 gears according to the official nominal, so if you shoot in hand at a position about 3-4 gears lower than the safety shutter, the advantage is obvious.

8. Contrast between the center and the edge of the image: If it is in the center, 16-35 can be completely comparable to 17-35 (golden wide angle); The biggest advantage of 16-35 is that the edge image quality is better. For this new lens, it is reasonable to do so after adopting the updated technology.

9. Distortion: Wide-angle end 16-35 is larger than gold wide-angle distortion, and telephoto end 16-35 is smaller than gold wide-angle distortion. If you pursue high quality, you need a later stage.

10, dark corner: As a wide-angle head, there will be dark corners, which is normal. Let's repair it later.

1 1. Backlight shooting: 16-35 adopts nanocrystalline coating, which has obvious advantages in all focal lengths, that is, there will be fewer ghosts.

12, color: Compared with the wide angle of gold, the color of 16-35 is brighter and more saturated.

To sum up:

2. 16-35 has high cost performance (compared with 14-24 and Jin wide angle). Not only is it much cheaper, but the imaging is really impeccable. Both the center and the edge have good image quality. The VR anti-shake function can make this lens lower than the safety shutter 4, and the shooting success rate is high. Speaking of disadvantages, the aperture is not big enough for F2.8, which may be its only disadvantage. But for landscape photographers, excellent imaging with small aperture and high-performance anti-shake function are more conducive to the stability of shooting under dark light and slow shutter, which are more favorable characteristics for landscape photography.