Seek a science fiction film

I, Robot

Public enemy of the machine

Directed by alex proyas of alex proyas.

Actor: will smith will smith

Bridget Moynahan

Bruce Green Ward Bruce Genwood

Type: science fiction/thriller

Grade: PG- 13 (action, nudity)

Release: Twentieth Century Fox of Twentieth Century Fox Company

Release date: July 2004 16.

◇ Story: Robots are going to riot! ? Humans are helpless.

This modern sci-fi film, adapted from isaac asimov's short story I, Robot, costs more than 1 billion dollars. The story is set in 2035, and there is an era of artificial intelligence robots for every fifteen people on the earth. Machine workers and machine assistants are everywhere. They even infiltrated into family life and assumed the responsibility of nanny and nursing. People rely more and more on advanced technology. Just a few days before the new model of the NS-5 robot in Chicago was about to be released, the creator of the American intelligent robot died unexpectedly. Detective Bernard (will smith) and robot psychologist (bridget moynahan) were ordered to investigate the mysterious death of the scientist.

Will smith suspected that the scientist's death was related to an artificial intelligence robot named Sony. But in fact, the NS-5 robot is programmed to strictly abide by the "three laws of robots", that is, it will not harm its owner. So what is the truth of the matter? Is there something wrong with the setup of the robot or is the whole incident a conspiracy? After more detailed investigation and exploration, various signs make will smith believe that "Sony" may be more than just a criminal. At the same time, he found that something more terrible was about to happen before his eyes. ...

/search? search = % E6 % 9C % BA % E6 % A2 % B0 % E5 % 85% AC % E6 % 95% 8C & amp； Suffix = & restype = 4 & ID = 2 Download address

High-rise buildings with cool colors, fast and stable intelligent vehicles, and high-intelligent humanoid robots walking in the streets and lanes create a stunning future world. At this time of the world, as an "automatic nanny" who can do almost anything, robots have become an indispensable necessity in people's lives. There is one robot for every five people on average. Moreover, driven by human civilization, robots update very quickly and have certain self-thinking ability, which is unique to human pride. The film itself seems to pay tribute to the famous three laws of robots put forward by Asimov in his early years, but it is not entirely true. Because the seemingly impeccable three laws actually have a flaw. That is, robots are legally required not to harm human beings and have the obligation not to harm human beings, but as long as people are alive, they may suffer from various natural and man-made disasters. More often, it is safer for humans to stay at home. At this time, if the robot knows that people may be hurt when they go out, but still let them go out, is this considered "hurting human beings"? Therefore, the natural result of the self-evolution of the giant intelligent robot "Vicky" in the film is to change from passive "can't hurt human beings" to active "protect human beings", that is, people are not allowed to leave home in the film. This kind of "protection" is undoubtedly "imprisonment" and "slavery" in human eyes.

In this way, the contradiction and embarrassment between human beings and machines are highlighted. On the one hand, it is a human being pretending to be the primate of all things, on the other hand, it is a high-tech product created by human beings themselves. This conflict runs through the whole movie. At the same time, movies also challenge the logical limit of human beings to some extent.

After all, human beings are not gods, and everything they create will have shortcomings in one way or another. For example, the current drugs will have some side effects on the human body; Inventions created by human beings in different periods of history have changed the whole process of social civilization, and many shortcomings will also be exposed because of the passage of time. So is science. People compare science to a double-edged sword, which will not only benefit mankind, but also bring disaster to mankind.

Now, humans can control machines, but no one can be sure that machines will one day surpass or even surpass humans and control humans.

Perhaps, the future destruction of mankind does not come from the crisis in outer space, but from the development and progress of human science and technology.

It is not alarmist that mankind will be destroyed by the high technology created by itself.