canon IXUS220HS VS Olympus XZ

Update 1:

do u have any other suggestion apart from these 2?

If we just talk about the specifications of the two machines

The XZ1 must be better. The price difference is thousands of dollars. The XZ1 is close to HK$3600. The Canon 220IS only costs about HK2300. /2.3-inch size. Noise control will be better

It is also easier to achieve a more obvious front-clear and rear-mask effect. XZ1 can film raw

It is helpful for image processing

You may not use it now

But there is no guarantee that you will use it in the future. XZ1 has aperture priority

Shutter priority is the same as full manual exposure

220HS It is only fully automatic. The most important thing is that XZ1 has a large aperture of F1.8

Even with zoom, it still has F2.5. It is very helpful for low-light photography

This is also the biggest problem of DC. On the other hand, the 220HS only has a relatively average aperture of F2.8

The zoom distance is F5.9. It is very difficult to use indoors. The minimum focusing distance of the XZ1 is shorter than that of the 220HS< /p>

The magnification rate will be higher

It is better for photographing fine objects. As for the 220HS, which is better than the XZ1, it has 1920 x 1080 short films

The XZ1 only has 1280 x 720 Short video. The 220HS lens is relatively wide-angle. But in fact, the XZ1 is already good. The 220HS body is relatively light. If you are talking about DC guys

Not counting SLRs and interchangeable lens DC

Me I think XZ1 is really good

In the past, I would recommend people to buy Canon S95. Now I would recommend XZ1. Although it is more expensive

, it is definitely worth the money. There are two web pages below The specifications of this camera are dcfever/cameras/database 2011-04-06 19:00:51 Supplement: For similar specifications, you can consider Panasonic LX5 or Samsung EX1. Both are large aperture models.