Three post-effects that photographers hate most

Lead: Cameras have been widely used in our lives. Many people are not satisfied with the photographic effect of the original camera and are willing to add filters to retouch the picture. Some late special effects will be praised if they are shown to colleagues and classmates. Everyone thinks you are very professional. On the contrary, I showed it to professional photographers, but I scoffed. I feel that I have no taste and skills, and I am ashamed of you! Shame on you. This is Theory of Three Represents's theory, and photographers hate post-effects.

Photographers hate three kinds of black and white backgrounds with late effects, and the main color is almost synonymous with bad taste in the eyes of photographers. Because this technology is out of date, the first person who created this special effect was a genius, but those who abused this technology later were mediocre people. The advantage of this special effect is that no matter how messy the background is, it can highlight the main body and post-production is very easy. However, professional photographers will definitely consider the background in the composition when shooting, and will not be in a mess and then change the background to black and white in post-production. So in their eyes, this effect is equivalent to outdated, low-tech content, and the public still loves this thing. So if you want to make your girlfriend happy, you might as well use it. If your girlfriend doesn't know photography.

There is only one color photo. I guess it's so unpopular, right? This photo was taken five years ago.

Duotone, a kind of nostalgic two-color effect, is as outdated as the above technique. As soon as the craze is over, it feels vulgar and too rampant, and professional photographers can't agree. But limited to photography, the public is still very depressed. Many cameras also have their own brown digital filters.

Double tones are easy to get, perhaps because they are too easy, so they are quickly overwhelmed.

Low-level HDR is real. Although I am an HDR enthusiast, unfortunately, the fact is that many photographers also hate HDR. There is nothing wrong with HDR itself, but because an excellent HDR work can not be easily completed with two or three mouse clicks. Many people still apply a preset HDR effect casually, and then put it on the Internet in a hurry, resulting in a large number of low-level HDR pictures on the Internet. Some excessive HDR pictures are unacceptable not only to photographers, but also to ordinary people. Therefore, I would like to point out in particular that the poor quality of HDR photos is absolutely the majority, which is also the main reason why such photos are notorious. Therefore, low-level HDR makes photographers so annoying. But when you learn to take HDR photos, who hasn't experienced the stage of "half a bucket of water"?

This is my early photo in HDR, but it's ok, isn't it? . Some early ones are too ugly to take out.

Are there any special effects that photographers hate?

Yes! As long as a special effect becomes popular, even the aunt selling vegetables and taxi drivers can easily do it, photographers will stay away from that special effect, such as model effect. It was just popular for a while. Although almost every portable camera has this function, it is actually a bit difficult to make it look like a ghost. It is not annoying to photographers, but it must not be used to make a living.

Although pressing a key can really achieve the effect of the model, it is not easy to make it look like a ghost, but it is not far away if it is not used well.

To sum up, it's just special effects that professional photographers don't like, and the public still likes them. However, please don't be too obsessed with some effects, and remember that the content of the photo is the key. Don't think that the effect is a mess and it becomes garbage and art. If photography is so simple, it is not worth studying.