Nantong children rarely appeared in graduation photo, and their parents demanded compensation from the photo studio. Is this appeal reasonable?

Nantong's children rarely appeared in graduation photo, and their parents demanded compensation from the photo studio. The claim has no factual and legal basis and the court does not support it.

This happened in June, 20021year. As Ms. Wang's daughter is about to graduate, in the activities organized by graduation, representatives of the family Committee reached a cooperation with a photo studio in Nantong. This studio is required to participate in the shooting activities of graduation season, including video recording, photo album setting and photo shooting. There are 32 children in Ms. Wang's daughter's kindergarten class, and each child needs 200 yuan for discount. However, Ms. Wang finally found that her daughter had too few opportunities to appear in the photos and felt cheated by the studio, so she took the studio to court and asked her to refund 200 yuan's photography fee, but in the end, the court did not support Ms. Wang's request.

Children in Nantong Kindergarten seldom show up in graduation photo, and parents demand compensation from the photo studio, which is not supported by the law.

After the graduation season, the studio provided more than 3,000 photos for parents to download, and there were nine minutes of selected videos. However, Ms. Wang said that there were too few photos of her daughter's appearance and she did not participate in the production of photos afterwards. Ms. Wang studied the service contract and found that 200~300 negatives would be provided, which should belong to each child's personal photos. However, he found that there were only about 50 photos of his daughter's face, so he took the studio to court, demanding the return of 200 yuan and compensation for 600 yuan's service fee. However, the court held that the studio did not conceal the truth, and Ms. Wang's appeal was not supported. It is reasonable for parents to take the photo studio to court because their children show up too little, but because there is no illegal act on the part of the photo studio, they have not won the case.

The court held that the photos taken by the studio were aimed at all students and parents, not just Ms. Wang's daughter, but also a one-on-one shooting service. Therefore, the photo album negatives and videos provided have fulfilled the service contents in the contract and do not support Ms. Wang's appeal. If you find that your rights and interests have been hurt in your life, it is really appropriate to take up legal weapons to protect yourself. At least you can know where you are wrong and admire Ms. Wang's courage.