Mate40 computational photography

Glory Magic 4 Pro and Huawei Mate 40 Pro? Simply put, the glory parameters are not lost, and the experience is not won.

In terms of performance, Glory Magic 4 Pro is equipped with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor, and Huawei Mate 40 Pro is equipped with Kirin 9000 processor. As for the running score, Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is certainly stronger, but Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is called Yanlong and Kirin 9000 is called Ice Kirin, which can explain the problem. In terms of daily experience, Snapdragon 8Gen65438+.

In the screen part, Glory Magic 4 Pro uses 6.8 1 inch organic light-emitting diode screen with diamond arrangement, which supports LTPO 120Hz adaptive refresh rate and 1920Hz high-frequency PWM dimming, while Huawei Mate 40 Pro uses 6.76-inch organic light-emitting diode screen with a refresh rate of 90Hz and does not support high-frequency PWM dimming function. So in this screen, glory Magic 4 Pro.

Glory Magic 4 Pro adopts 50MP main camera (IMX766)+50MP super wide angle +64MP periscope telephoto (3.5X dimming, OIS optical image stabilization), Huawei Mate 40 Pro adopts 50MP main camera (IMX700Y)+20MP movie camera+12MP periscope telephoto (5X dimming, OIS optical image stabilization), and two.

In terms of battery life, Glory Magic 4 Pro has a built-in 4600mAh battery, which supports 100W wired fast charging and 50W wireless fast charging. Huawei Mate 40 Pro has a built-in 4400mAh battery, which supports 66W wired fast charging and 50W wireless fast charging. Glory Magic 4 Pro has some advantages in battery capacity and fast charging. In the peripheral part, there is little difference between the two.

Generally speaking, the actual experience of Snapdragon 8, the broken chip of Glory Magic 4 Pro, is not as good as that of Kirin 9000. Moreover, in terms of images, Huawei's strength is much stronger than glory. Even if the hardware of glory is no matter how good, it is not necessarily better than Huawei, not to mention its hardware is not better than Huawei. Of course, glory Magic 4 Pro is not without advantages. For example, it performs better on the screen, charges faster and costs less. As for how to choose, anyway, it is best not to touch Snapdragon 8' s mobile phone.

I think support should be mutual!

Why do you always appeal to consumers to support XX mobile phones? Why not appeal to XX manufacturers to be sincere to users, use better materials and have reasonable prices? As long as the manufacturers show sincerity to make excellent products of inclusive consumers, users naturally support them.

No enterprise should just let consumers pay manufacturers unilaterally? As an ordinary consumer, I need products with high cost performance and strong comprehensive performance.

Therefore, we should warn all manufacturers not to match low prices with high prices, but to support them in both directions. If we talk about "feelings", ZTE is the mobile phone that Chinese people should buy most. Because ZTE was first suppressed by the United States, and ZTE is a state-owned enterprise, the profits of products can directly enter the big plate of government finance, instead of fooling people with high-priced and low-priced mobile phones. As a result, profits went into the pockets of bosses.

However, as a state-owned enterprise, ZTE has strict fund management and cannot have sky-high marketing fees. Therefore, it is difficult to have a voice on the Internet, and it can only be "defeated" by my friend's X Army, so the sales volume and influence are not too high.

I am a staunch supporter of domestic brands.

To buy a mobile phone, I choose Xiaomi OPPO vivo ZTE among domestic brands.

If they are all 5G phones, of course I will choose the 40 series first, followed by the 4 series. Although the 40 series is expensive but cost-effective, it is unnecessary, and the second mobile phone can also sell at a high price. It's just that the HarmonyOS system has great advantages. Then 4 does not have this advantage.

I support Huawei. After all, it's Lao Tzu and one is his son.

It is suggested to use Master Lu to compare and test to see which one is more cost-effective.

How can it be compared with the brand and experience? Comparing the parameters, glory can be compared with any one.