100 points for questioning! ! ! Which camera is suitable to buy for around 3,000 yuan?

The budget is not high, but the requirements are not low, haha!

There are some contradictions in demand: it needs to be simple to operate, but it needs to be manually enriched. It is difficult to unify the two.

With a budget of 3500, the GF2 you mentioned is out of business. The LX5 has a more mature shape, high-quality workmanship, and good focusing and macro functions. However, the distortion at the wide-angle end of the LX5 is more obvious, and the telephoto end is also slightly lacking. The overall reputation is good.

Looking at the Sony hx100 again, it has fine workmanship and excellent shell texture. It has the famous Carl Zeiss T lens, a maximum aperture of 2.8, 30 times the light change, a super wide-angle end, and can intelligently identify dozens of scenes. It can also take panoramic scans. There are also many manual functions. Scenes can also be selected individually (skin beautification, background blur, etc.), the camera is full HD 1920X1080, 50P+, and Dolby-certified stereo recording; the disadvantage is that the picture quality is poor in low light and the battery capacity is not very high. The overall evaluation is also very good. It is a camera suitable for boys.

Several cameras have outstanding advantages and disadvantages. I personally recommend the hx100 for your reference. Thanks.

In addition, when you answer, please consider the budget mentioned by the questioner. Don't talk about it. With a budget of 3500, can Canon G12 and 3500 be affordable? In addition, the person named cqxhhf said, "Compared with your LX3, the Sony HX100 is a camera with a 1/2.3-inch sensor, and the photo definition is relatively poor." Do you know what the concept of poor definition is? You can see the difference in sharpness with the naked eye. Do you think Sony's HX100 is a mobile phone? Don't just pick some reviews from the Internet and post them casually. You must have used them yourself and compared them. Pure nonsense.

---

Also, qiqu12, I fully understand the important role of sensors in SLRs. What I want to express is that the naked eye will not judge the image quality of LX3 and HX100 in JPG format. There is no obvious difference in the clarity because I have used both. Moreover, this question is to help the questioner recommend a suitable camera. If you have any suggestions, you can post them. Don't always use some ridiculous data to illustrate the so-called differences.

One more thing I want to remind you, qiqu12, when I was playing SLR, you might still be liquid.

---