Is it really inconvenient to go out with a SLR?

Leisure travel is also ok, just put it in your carry-on bag.

Talk about the inconvenience:

My camera+three commonly used lenses+camera bag weight is nearly 20 kg. If you climb mountains or hike, explore roads or cross long distances, the burden is really tired. If it's climbing a hill or going downstream, let alone considering it.

In some cases, it is not suitable to use SLR. Long-winded: Please observe morality and don't shoot what you shouldn't!

For example, some scenic spots, calligraphy and painting exhibitions, museums and special buildings are not well managed because they involve cultural relics protection and copyright issues (especially calligraphy and painting and precious cultural relics have copyright and property rights, and copying is prohibited). If you shoot them with an ordinary camera, the managers will basically ignore you, but if you use a SLR, it will definitely be stopped.

Concerts, theaters, etc. Neither is suitable, because the shutter sound is louder when shooting with SLR. Even if many SLR cameras now have mute shutters, they will be reprimanded.

Some photographers like to "sweep the street" and record the interesting things they see on the road. SLR is bigger and more conspicuous. When you hold it in your hand, it has attracted the attention and vigilance of others, so it is very difficult to catch it.

In the face of some news emergencies, shooting with a mobile phone may be understandable. Send a circle of friends to show off. If you use a SLR, everyone will think that this person is not big and looks fun. ...

In some individual scenic spots, thieves focus on photographers from other places. Because when you shoot, your attention is in the viewfinder and you don't care about anything else.

However, if you are a photographer, no matter how high the mountain is, no matter how heavy the camera is, you must carry it ~ ~