Xiaohongshu pays attention and cancels the other party immediately, okay?

Source: Grey production circle is integrated from Red Star News and News Square.

Over the years, there have been more and more child models.

Appear in public.

Whether it's a catwalk or a photo shoot.

But have you ever paid attention?

How is Tong Mo's posture?

In recent days

Some bloggers broke the news online.

Questioning social platforms

"Suspected child pornography gang"

In the article, the blogger said that she was the mother of a child. When browsing the underwear recommended by others in the little red book, she found that the photos posted by someone were unsightly.

She questioned whether these pictures were code words for child pornography.

▲ One of the pictures reported by bloggers. Photos provided by interviewees.

Break the news, mom

Questioning that some photos of Little Red Book involve child pornography.

It has been reported to the capital network police.

On March 1 1, the reporter found the blogger Ms. Liu who broke the news. "March 10, I chose underwear for my three-year-old daughter. People with children may understand that children's underwear is difficult to buy comfortably, so I went to Xiaohongshu to read the evaluation. "

Ms. Liu said that she accidentally saw the cover pictures posted by some netizens on the platform, and felt that the posture of girls was too strange and somewhat unsightly. Ms. Liu thought that no mother would send such photos of her children, so she clicked on the relevant account and found more suspicious places.

These cover pictures are marked with the physical photos of underwear of the brand "My Gardener". In addition, two different accounts posted photos of the same child lying in the same bed.

▲ The pictures sent by two different Little Red Book user IDs show the same child in the same scene. Photos provided by interviewees.

After things fermented, on March 17, netizens exposed another children's underwear store to play the edge ball! Caused strong condemnation.

Among them, the pictures are even more unsightly, such as this one, a typical Japanese peach hip sitting posture, which is the natural sitting posture of children?

With wet hair like an adult, the expression on her face is the expression of cherry mouth slightly open, which is definitely not something that children of this age can do naturally. Isn't posing a requirement of photographers or businesses?

Almost all the underwear photos in this store are to "stretch" the "shape" of private parts, which makes people feel very uncomfortable!

But all underwear is basically this pattern:

A child's underwear, what is the need to show it like this?

A large number of girls are lying in bed, and we don't understand the significance of this photo. Show what?

Why do the little girl's pants pose like this? Isn't this 100% adult posture?

Many even ordinary socks are shot in a very strange and adult way, which has nothing to do with the context and may even be misunderstood as an adult woman's display:

If you think that only girls do this, then you look down on this store, and so do the boys' clothes in this store. Which boy's underwear needs to be displayed like this? More exciting attention to WeChat official account: Network Chongkoujun

Most of the similar pictures of boys are like this, and some netizens suspect that it is intentional P:

The above is only a part of it, and there are some large-scale close-up pictures that are directly judged as illegal pictures on the platform and hung up.

"In the past, some girls on some online platforms said that they were going to travel to evaluate hotel rooms. Many men below ask' how much is the hotel for a night', but they actually ask the price of girls. "

As a mother, Ms. Liu thinks that "my gardener" may be a similar code word.

Then Ms. Liu contacted one of the bloggers who posted pictures and had 37,000 fans. In their chat records, the blogger said that he had nothing to do with My Gardener, but he also admitted that the picture was taken by himself and felt that there was nothing wrong with it.

At present, Ms. Liu has reported the case to the capital network police.

Under her Weibo post.

Guangzhou Women's Federation replied that

"It has been transferred to relevant departments for investigation"

The reporter clicked on several small red book users reported by Ms. Liu and found that there were no relevant pictures. Click on the personal homepage and find that some users only have a few fans, and several articles published are also advertising content.

Underwear brand Fang

Never put an advertisement in the little red book.

Netizens who suspect rumors.

I have already contacted the network police.

The reporter found that the brand "My Gardener" belongs to Gardener (Beijing) Care Products Co., Ltd., which was established in Chaoyang Branch of Beijing Administration for Industry and Commerce on July 3 1 2065438.

On March 1 1, the reporter called "My Gardener", and the customer service said that someone had reported it maliciously. The release of the picture was actually the spontaneous behavior of the buyer.

On March 12, the public relations of My Gardener said, "We have never put an advertisement in Little Red Book. As for whether it is the behavior of customers shooting independently, I don't know for the time being. " At the same time, she said that the company has taken the initiative to contact the network police because of suspected netizens' rumors.

The children underwear ads searched by reporters in the company's official website are all pictures on the beach, but there are no similar pictures in Little Red Book.

▲ The official advertisement of children's underwear of Gardener (Beijing) Care Products Co., Ltd..

There is a promotional video of the company's girls' nursing underwear on the online platform, but the photographer said that the promotional video was shot three or four years ago, which is a normal shooting method, and there is no sexy or suggestive lens or feeling, which is natural.

The reporter also used

Words such as "children's underwear" and "girls' underwear"

Search on e-commerce platform

Some female models were also found.

Photos in underwear

For these photos,

Netizens have different opinions.

Some netizens also believe that this is to show that children are wearing underwear, which is very cute and just normal publicity.

Some netizens also think that the angle and posture of taking pictures are indecent, and the lens language contains certain sexual hints.

Experts and lawyers

Advertising mainly grasps the scale problem.

The platform shall promptly accept relevant complaints.

A college advertising professional said that advertisements should not contain obscene and pornographic content. Advertising can be based on the product itself rather than the image display, such as the fabric composition of underwear, which is also a more concerned factor for children's underwear purchase decision makers.

▲ Some related product pages searched by reporters on an e-commerce platform.

Lawyer Liu Xiu thinks:

Some pictures in this case may involve "child pornography" or "soft pornography", and businesses or producers may face administrative penalties for making and publishing such advertisements that violate public order and good customs.

In addition, Liu Xiu also said that the Law on the Protection of Minors specifically stipulates the "network protection" clause. For similar complaints and reports of netizens involving minors, the online platform should accept and deal with them in time, otherwise it may have to bear high fines or even revoke its business license.

What do you think of this matter?

Do you think these gestures are soft porn?