How do you evaluate the Hanfu micro-movie "Zhongliang"? What is its level?

I have never made a micro-movie, and I don’t understand it. I just look at it from the perspective of a person who knows a little bit about Hanfu and an audience. Just say "Hanfu micro-movie". This topic, or thing, itself is a very embarrassing thing. For example, what did you say you were shooting? Do you want to shoot Hanfu promotion and introduction? There are quite a few people who have photographed them, but if you search online, you will find that most of them are meaningless. The girl is pretty, but the whole content is so stupid, stupid, and stupid. Then another representative direction is the historical theme of "Zhongliang". This direction is actually the most embarrassing! Let's just talk about "Zhongliang". Is it really okay for someone who has nothing to do with Hanfu to watch it? I think a 20-minute thing has too much historical background! This is not something that can be shown in 20 minutes. The foothold is too big. Just like the respondent said that it was adapted from short novels, yes, micro movies are like short stories. If you look at the world's top short stories, in just a few pages, they are a flesh-and-blood story, which makes people enjoy themselves. dripping. The same is true for excellent micro-movies. In just ten minutes, people can see a complete and rich story. But in fact, I feel that the plot of "Zhongliang" is very empty, purely a patchwork of "iconic plots". And he is not a top actor. From the details in his eyes and movements, I can see that the actor wants to perform well, but in fact it feels "unnatural" to the audience. Furthermore, the matter of clothing is also an important reason why I say "Hanfu micro-movies are embarrassing." What is the difference between Hanfu historical dramas and ancient costume historical dramas? However, the current situation is that "most costume dramas do not pay attention to the research and production of costumes, and are flashy", resulting in "Hanfu historical dramas can be regarded as sophisticated costumes." Then, if a serious and wealthy director comes and makes a movie or TV series without using rubbish curtains, will there be any advantages to Hanfu movies or TV series? Is there any difference? So it's embarrassing. Hanfu is something that is reconstructed based on ancient costumes and based on the nation. Hanfu historical dramas are not much different from ancient costume historical dramas. If you look at some historical dramas in the past, they have a lot of laces and center seams, which is more reliable than many Hanfu merchants. So why do so many people still say yes? Firstly, this is a student work, and the actors are not top-notch; secondly, the screenwriter (seems to be a certain respondent?) is probably not a top-notch screenwriter in China; thirdly, this was created by "people related to Hanfu". Therefore, its comparison objects are often micro-movies produced by students, or film and television works in the Hanfu circle. So in this comparison, "Zhongliang" can naturally be regarded as a good work. If you look at my answer, it seems that I am not here to praise it, but I still have a very positive attitude towards this "Zhongliang", but the good points have been mentioned by other respondents = =|||. Finally, I want to say that "Zhongliang" is not only a good example for the Hanfu industry - serious attitude, good production; but it is also not an example - we should carefully and rethink the selection of materials and plot arrangements. If the whole country follows this as a template The future of making a short film about Hanfu is not bright. I also know that it is not easy to make. Just like I don’t know how to cook. Although I can’t tell you how to cook, I can still taste what’s wrong with the taste. I hope there will be more works that can make people who have nothing to do with Hanfu feel comfortable and say it is good. That is truly excellent work.