Why do many portrait photographers switch from Canon to Sony?

I only use Weineng to choose other Nikon brands.

Hello, to be exact, it's a cameraman from Canon. Many people left Canon and went to Sony. Yes, this is mainly the cameraman.

For photo studios, photography studios, wedding photography, children's photography and beauty photography, Canon is still the absolute main force, and it will be difficult to be replaced in the future.

However, to be honest, Canon's camera performance is not as good as Panasonic and Sony. Therefore, it is really wise to give up Canon and go to Sony and Panasonic for professional video shooting.

Photography and video, yard by yard.

In the professional fields of radio, television and film, Canon is actually a program terminator. Canon robbed more than half of the civilian market, which made Gensonnie and Panasonic very unhappy.

But Canon has never really entered the radio and television film market, that is, the TV station market and the film market. For those who shoot videos professionally, Canon is basically not the first choice.

Although Sony and Panasonic have also made great efforts in the civilian market recently, Canon has a very solid market in wedding photography and activity photography.

Why?

Because Sony's direct color is too bad and Sony's operation is too professional. Although Sony is more professional than Canon.

But for wedding photography, simplicity, high efficiency, reducing costs and increasing profits are the king.

Therefore, in the wedding camera market, as well as a large number of civilian markets, Canon still has great advantages and tenacious vitality.

Just say, in the professional image shooting market, Canon may indeed be completely driven out, especially now that Panasonic has also launched the Quan Huafu micro-single, I'm afraid Canon will never get their hands on the professional image shooting market in the future.

Finally, talk about the photo market!

For many people, it is actually just taking pictures without taking pictures.

Moreover, to put it bluntly, there are photographers and there are no photographers.

Photographers basically rely on photography to earn money to support their families, even short videos from the media.

For photographers, for users who don't take pictures.

In fact, I think Canon SLR and Fuji micro-single, as well as future Panasonic micro-single, are very good.

But for camera users, Fuji micro-sheets are not enough. Even if Fuji has made some efforts recently, the parameters are beautiful. However, I'm afraid Fuji will never return to heaven. Well, Fuji is powerless in the camera market, that's for sure.

If you just take pictures, my suggestions are as follows:

1, if you mainly shoot portraits, beautiful women and children, Canon should be the best choice at present and in the future, that's for sure.

2. If you are a young man in travel photography, daily life photography and literature and art, then Fuji Micro-single is very good.

3. If you are a professional photographer, well, a professional photographer, a professional photographer, the most promising system in the future is Panasonic's Quan Huafu micro-single.

Why do many portrait photographers switch from Canon cameras to Suni now? Whether it is a Canon camera or a Suni camera, photographers know that, first, it is performance comparison. The performance of micro-single lens is incomparable to any camera. I think the portrait photos taken by Canon cameras are very colorful. After using Suni camera, it is really troublesome to use Suni camera, but it needs to be adjusted when taking portraits. Otherwise, it is impossible to compare portrait photos with Canon cameras. If you use a Canon camera, don't change the Suni camera. If you have never used a Canon camera, you can use a Suni camera. This is called no contrast, so there is no harm. If you use a Canon camera from the beginning, don't change the Suni camera, because the Suni camera needs to adjust the color every time. Canon doesn't need to adjust the color, and the color of portrait photos looks good. If you use Suni camera again, you will feel that you are not used to using Suni camera. This is the only difference between Canon and Suni camera. You have to use your own habits. Thank you!

Many portrait photographers have replaced Canon cameras with Sony? I wonder if the questioner of this question has real data. In my opinion, this trend has not fundamentally changed. Portrait photographers use canon, which was and is now.

It is a fact that the traditional camera brands Canon and Nikon have lost customers, which can be seen from the official statement, but this is a comprehensive market trend, and not all the lost customers have gone to Sony. There is no denying that some door-changing users have switched from Canon to Sony, but this has not become the mainstream, especially "portrait photographers". I know that if I say this, there will definitely be many so-called fans of a certain sect to attack, but it doesn't matter. I don't want to join any camera brand dispute, which is meaningless.

People who like early adopters are not really "photographers" but enthusiasts. Except for professionals who are sponsored by manufacturers to try out cameras, most ordinary professional photographers like photography, landscape photography, fashion photography and so on. , and will not easily change the camera brand. This brand change is not to give up all the original lenses and buy them again, but the whole working system must be rebuilt. This is not just a financial investment. The whole team should re-learn to adapt to the new system, the supporting lighting system should be readjusted, the technology of post-patching should be changed, all supporting batteries and other accessories should be replaced, and the most important thing is to re-run the teamwork. The change of this door is not only the cost of capital investment, but also the inconvenience of work, and its intangible cost is greater than the computable cost.

For photographers who shoot portraits, no matter whether they shoot personal portraits, private houses, children or various documentary portraits, it can be said that any brand of cameras on the market can meet the demand. The matter of "taking pictures" pays more attention to the photographer's experience, technology and teamwork, and has little to do with the current camera model. As long as the technical style, workflow, equipment and post-training are unified in a working team, the film can meet the creative needs. This will not lead to any essential difference in works because of Canon's lower tolerance, nor will it lead to more hindquarters because of Sony's fewer lenses, nor will it cause great work inconvenience because of which is better, optical focusing or cmos integrated focusing. I can only say that all cameras can meet the needs of work, especially photo photography, and the differences between these models are really minimal.

Of course, many photographers who change doors choose Sony a7 series not to improve the quality of photos, but to expand the types of shooting subjects, which is conducive to the transfer of video to creation. Sony, including Panasonic, does have a deep technical background in video. At present, many civilian models have applied the following professional video technologies, such as log, such as 4k, such as better sampling rate, such as high frame rate and so on. These Canon models are really not as real as Sony's. Sony or even Panasonic is a good choice for video shooting. This is no problem. But if a photographer changes doors to Sony, I personally feel that there is really a lack of factual data.

I really don't like people who haven't touched Sony Quan Huafu micro-singles. Say something.

Canon's 80d, 6d2 and 5d4 were used at first, and then Sony a7m2 was used. To tell you the truth, I'm not satisfied with m2, especially the shutter. The time lag is very long, and the shutter sounds annoying. The battery really doesn't work. I bought three spare parts and later replaced them with a7m3. This machine is really cool, full-screen focusing, high-speed continuous shooting, accurate and fast focusing. What? The battery is broken? You find a channel to try! M3 can persist at the end of a normal shooting day. I didn't go to see how many pictures I took, because I almost never had to worry about running out of electricity. I can also bring a charging treasure with too high intensity for shooting and charge it at any time.

I think many people say that micro-menu is not good. First, it's never been used. It is also possible that changing doors is too expensive and Sony lenses are expensive. And many people are used to the operation of Canon Nikon. The way Sony defines shortcut keys is not used by many people. There is also the fact that Canon people have more advantages in skin color performance without later period.

The mage is too old to carry the SLR. If they change the micro-order, they will have a sense of accomplishment.

Just like martial arts, you can defend yourself against the enemy by learning boxing and practicing sword. It's like practicing taking photos with your mobile phone, mastering the basics, becoming a master in SLR, and finally wandering around the rivers and lakes with a little black card.

The above is a joke, but in many cases, it is also true: when I first started, I always felt that equipment was very important. Give me that good lens, and I can take better photos. If I had that camera, I could have taken these good photos. ...

After a long time, I finally found that the head portrait behind my camera has the highest value! The equipment really doesn't matter at this time. What SLR can do, what micro-single can do, what SLR can't do, micro-single can still do, and it's light and easy to carry, so why not ... for a change!

Then why Sony? To tell the truth, there are really no micro-orders, and the categories in Bisogni are more complete. Even if one or two of them can surpass it, photography needs to be systematic. Unlike mobile phones, Apple can be used as soon as it is thrown away by Huawei tomorrow.

Sony has been listed since 2065 438+03 A7, and has been updating the micro-list. Wife is fast, there are always some points that can firmly grasp your caution and make you want to stop!

There are A9, A7s, A7r, A7m, Rx 1, Rx 10, Rx0 ... Come on, what's missing? Maybe facing Sony, we can only say that we are short of money. ...

Don't those who spit out Sony yellow, those who have black bellies and Sony menus, and those who complain about Sony batteries hate iron and steel because they expect too much from Sony? ...

Take photos > record > look up > show off > take orders > make money > ... What do you want the camera to help you achieve?

The camera said, I'm embarrassed because most people won't tell me what he wants from me. ...

Or the great god ET said, expensive and good.

Buy it, buy it, change it, change it, don't hesitate to pick the expensive one and kill it!

At the moment you press the shutter, you can feel the meat bleeding, so he can smoke and look into the distance with an indifferent expression. It is meaningful to tell the little whites that after playing photography for many years, I am rarely worth pressing the shutter now!

After practicing peerless martial arts, it is not easy. Congratulations to the world, you will get another old mage!

First of all, this question is a false proposition:

What is the origin of this problem?

Who gave the statistics?

Many amateur players abandon Canon's SLR camera and switch to Sony's micro-camera. This situation exists. However, the upgrading of photographers' equipment is two-way, and many people are not satisfied with Sony's micro-orders and turn to Canon's products. This situation is not uncommon.

Therefore, this question is completely fabricated and speculated, which does not conform to the objective facts.

Secondly, how to compare Sony's camera system with Canon's camera system?

First of all, Canon's products are now in the transition stage from SLR cameras to micro-single cameras, while Sony has completed this mode conversion in previous years, so the system at this stage is perfect as follows:

Canon SLR > Sony Micro Single > Canon Dan Wei

Sony's main advantages are advanced image sensor technology and powerful computing power of image processor (arm architecture). Therefore, Sony's micro-camera parameters and specifications are excellent. For example, video recording, a7m3 is much better than Canon 5D4 and EOS R. ..

Canon's response to the advantages of Sony Electronics is mainly solved in two ways:

Canon SLR camera is faced with optical framing+independent focusing module+multiprocessor parallelism.

Canon's micro-camera uses a larger bayonet and better lens control.

Therefore, I hope that photographers will rationally look at the "brand dispute" between devices. There is no best product, only the equipment that suits you best.

I won't leave Canon for Sony. I remember many years ago, my relatives went to America and brought back a Sony. At that time, they called for a digital camera to replace the SLR, but it didn't take long for it to break down. At that time, there was no maintenance department in China, so I threw this Sony away and wasted hundreds of dollars. So I left a bad impression on Sony, and as long as I saw Sony in the future, I left far away. Now it is said that Sony Dafa micro-single is very powerful, but I won't buy it, even though our unit has a Sony camera, which is only used to record leadership activities.

First of all, Canon and Nikon are among the best in the SLR camera photography market. Sony also appeared in the traditional SLR market a few years ago, but now it is rare. Regarding the micro-single, I have to say that Sony is a black technology and the best one. Then the point comes. Why abandon Canon SLR and enter Sony micro-single?

The key is that people like to pursue novelty, like to wear new clothes and like new products and applications. As soon as the black technology of Sony Micro-single comes out, there will inevitably be a large number of photographers to follow up.

The second is the portability of micro-single. According to my experience, the micro-sheet is small and portable, and it is intuitive to take pictures. Compared with SLR, it is really convenient, but the battery life is too troublesome. In the past, the SLR was charged for several days at a time, and the micro-single took two or three batteries. Sleeping in the hotel at night is also worried about charging.

Third, Sony dominates the camera field, so Sony's micro-camera function is very easy to use. This is very fashionable, it should be a follow-up video fire. Fourth, Sony is the first to launch a micro-single with 4K and 40 million pixels or more, which surpasses SLR in image quality and has more advantages in video, attracting many people to pursue it.

Fifth, the focus area is large and there are many points, which can be said to be almost full-screen focus.

Sixth, Sony Dafa has done a good job in advertising.

However, the disadvantages of microlens are also obvious: the larger lens is not coordinated when installed on the microlens, the endurance of the microlens is too poor, the reaction speed is slightly slow, and the microlens group is weak.

It is difficult to answer typing on mobile phone, please correct me.

I feel that there are also many Canon users.