Changjin Lake Film Review

The film reviews of Changjin Lake are as follows:

In terms of plot, it belongs to the ending mode of low opening and high walking. First of all, it explains the characters and historical background. The middle climax is fascinating, but the end is abrupt, and the meaning is still unfinished, which is a bit hasty. There are many wonderful passages in the literary drama, such as a small notebook filled with the names of the comrades who died, oil painting photos when * * * appeared at the venue, and finally the US military officers took off their hats to salute the volunteers who froze to death. Too many details are worth discussing separately.

Of course, the best part is "Wu Wanli argued on the train why he had to fight". Debate, comrades-in-arms have their own reasons. However, as soon as the door was opened, the Great Wall of Wan Li, the motherland, came into view, magnificent and engulfing mountains and rivers. Why are you fighting? Needless to say, the answer lies in this great river and mountain. I have to say, the handling here is really advanced.

In terms of characterization, the two most prominent figures are Wu Wan Li and Lei Gong. In fact, the advancement of the story implies the growth line and ending line of these two recruits and veterans. Jackson Yee's performance was unexpected and his personality changed well. It is estimated that he can win another award for his role as "Wu Wanli".

Hu Jun's "tripterygium wilfordii" is actually the fulcrum to lay the tone of this team, optimistic, humorous and opinionated. No matter from the content of the film itself or the audience's viewing experience, the role of this role is a balance between seriousness and entertainment, so it is very important. Hu Jun's performance was effortless until the final sacrifice, and he successfully completed the shaping of this role.

In the war part, the overall design of the first battle is very good, fast editing in slow motion, moderate relaxation, bombing, gun battle, hand-to-hand combat and sniper. All kinds of battles are comprehensive, dynamic and static, coarse and fine, and the plasma spraying design is even more shocking. The ups and downs when the lens moves create a strong sense of existence.

On the other hand, the process of completely destroying the enemy on the hillside is a high expression of the wisdom of the volunteer soldiers in the field war. On the other hand, the second general attack was not satisfactory. The big scene of the 10,000-person attack was shocking, but the local fighting passed by, lacking further creativity. It is a pity that the overall scene scheduling, war design and narrative structure are not as good as the first one.