Yang Mi was maliciously photographed up her skirt by a proxy photographer, but some people complained that Yang Mi should not dress like this. Is it Yang Mi’s fault?

Recently, the incident of Yang Mi being maliciously photographed on the set has once again appeared on the hot search list. In the picture, the shooting angle of the acting photographer has aroused heated discussions among netizens. Regardless of right or wrong, netizens Among the many comments, some strange voices appeared? Yang Mi wears such short clothes and is photographed by weird people?

Hey, listen to this classic "victim is guilty" theory, and then think back to the murder of the Didi woman. Are the people who also complained about the woman's dress been clamoring wildly? You deserve it for wearing less? You are always the same group of people? As an absolute passerby, even if the malicious shooting is a way of publicity, this "victim theory" also makes me angry!

When did it become wrong to be victimized? When is it that when we evaluate something, our first reaction is not to blame the perpetrator, but to find fault with the victim? If we follow the way of thinking of these people, before trying a murderer, is it necessary to resurrect the victim and point at his nose and ask him? Why didn't he kill others instead of you? ?

What ridiculous and irrelevant remarks, how dark a person’s heart must be to spout such irresponsible words from his mouth, not to mention, Yang Mi Wearing less? In fact, on the day she was maliciously photographed, Yang Mi's outfit seemed to me to be perfectly normal! When she was being photographed, she even used her coat to cover her exposed legs. Can Yang Mi be blamed for dressing like this?

What’s more, they can even apply the truth to the fact that public figures have gains and losses, thinking that it is not normal for Yang Mi to make so much money and be photographed. The reason why people are called people is because they must have a moral bottom line and a code of conduct. What about public figures? Public figures also have their own privacy and civil rights. We can accuse public figures of cheating and bringing unhappiness to society. Good public opinion guidance, but we will never force a public figure not to wear shorts, and the reason is, just because she is a public figure, she should be photographed wearing shorts!

We were once angry because of the sentence "Chinese people and dogs are not allowed to enter", and now these "victims are guilty" remarks are using the same logic to try to subvert people's three views. I I'm not a fan of Yang Mi. Even in my opinion, Yang Mi's acting skills are indeed full of flaws. But in this matter, whether we are complaining about the media exaggerating the facts or complaining about the malicious photographer who has no bottom line, the target of our complaints cannot and should not be Yang Mi.

Back to the matter itself, we may guess that this so-called malicious shooting was just from a lower angle. Judging from Yang Mi’s clothes at the time, it was not possible to capture any revealing scenes. We can even guess that this farce was nothing more than a farce. It's artificial hype to gain popularity and promote Yang Mi's new drama. But no matter what you speculate, please keep the bottom line as a human being and don’t let the theory of victim guilt pollute the world again.