Who took pictures of American astronauts on the moon?

It was Ralph Rene, an American writer, who was the first to point out that NASA made a fraud in the United States! In the book Apollo Moon Landing, it is pointed out that the photo was taken in the National Studio of Urban Mercury in Nevada. David Percy, a British photographer, pointed out that the photos of Apollo on the Moon showed that light could only be formed in the studio. In the second issue of "X-FACTOR", people pointed out more than 20 questions about eight main moon landing photos taken by Apollo astronauts with fixed cameras on their chests.

Details are as follows:

Photo 1: Apollo-1 1

Image quoted from: X-FACTOR No.2 (1September, 997), original image quoted from: NASA)

Neil armstrong and Buzz Aldrin are on the surface of the moon. The camera is on the top of the lunar module. Aldrin's body projection A is longer than Armstrong's, and the light on the moon only comes from the sun, so it is impossible to have such a discordant body projection.

The sun shines on Buzz Aldrin's left shoulder. Although his right side is in the shadow, people can clearly see the right side B of his spacesuit, which should be very dark because the light on the moon is very bright.

Since there is no atmosphere (air) on the moon that affects the light, all photos should be clear and bright. But in Aldrin's background, C is Xi n and V is too dark.

Aldrin's face helmet D reflects an abnormal object, some people think it is a helicopter, others think it is a glass object, and its size is12m. NASA claims that this is a device on the moon.

NASA claims that this thing is the shadow of an airplane. This photo was taken 95 kilometers away from the surface of the moon. But a big plane flies at low altitude, and it is impossible for the plane to have such a big shadow on the earth.

When Apollo-14 lunar module Antares landed on the surface of the moon, there was no F pit under its leg. In fact, when the plane landed in the sand, there should be a pit.

There is a similar footprint on the left side g of the lunar module, but no one has been here before.

The "unitelstates" h written on the left side of the lunar module is clearly visible and should be a shadow.

John young (photo 5) shows people a sky without stars and moon. If NASA can't replicate the moon's sky,

Maybe it will be much easier to choose a simple black background. Nasa claims that the sunlight is so bright that the light from the stars disappears.

The American flag and "Unitel States" can be clearly seen on the shadow surface of the lunar module, but the gold foil around it is dark and invisible. This effect can be formed or treated by spotlights in photo studios.

There is an abnormal phenomenon in Alan Bean. His head is clearly visible, but this camera is on Charles Conrad's chest. The ground is flat, and the top of the helmet should not be seen in the photo.

People can see that the shadow M in Alan Bean's helmet appears in different directions, so there must be multiple light sources.

There is strong light at the bottom of the instrument N held by Bean, which is caused by multiple light sources. If Bean's clothes reflect light to the instrument, the other parts of the instrument will not be too strong and too bright.

In this photo, the point P covered by a cross quadrant line is cut, and each photo has a cross quadrant line Q, which may be caused by the reflection of light, but it may also be a cut and pasted photo.

In the foreground of this photo, people can see a stone engraved with an R that looks like the English letter "C", which is the number of a stage prop.

The photo shows that there is an abnormal mark on the tire track left on the ground. And this kind of footprint can be made by stereotypes.

It takes water to form such clear tire tracks and footprints, but it is impossible to get such a humid environment on the surface of the moon.

When the lunar module landed, it didn't hit a hole on the surface of the moon.

The strong gas generated during the landing of the lunar module will blow away the dust nearby, so it is impossible to see the footprints of astronauts near the lunar module, at least there should be diffusion traces washed by the airflow!

Since the sun is the only light source on the moon, the shadows of all objects in the moon landing photos should be parallel, but the shadows in many photos are in different directions, showing that there is more than one light source or the light source is very close to the object.

Why are some photos taken in different places with exactly the same background, as if using the same set version?

After the mission to the moon was completed, the lunar module did not see the flame from the rocket engine when it flew off the moon surface, which proved that it was false. The lunar module was also a model hoisted by steel cables.

As long as the so-called moon landing films are played with the fast mirror, it will be found that the actions of astronauts and lunar rover are exactly the same as those on earth, which proves that these films are false.

The glass of the camera used by astronauts is engraved with several crosshairs to facilitate the measurement of the photographed objects. Why are these crosshairs not superimposed on the object, but on the back of some photos, proving that these so-called crosshairs were added afterwards and these photos are fake?

See website/376006/blog/item/6677d3a7e31c7793d14358ed.html.