What formalism do you hate most in the current education field? What are the disadvantages?

1. Professional title evaluation. Various written materials in triplicate, signed by the witness and stamped with the official seal of the unit. Know it's fake, but do it anyway! All the written materials submitted are nearly half a foot thick. In the early years, I used an file bag. Now the personnel unit directly sells unified packages, which are thick and heavy! That's not counting, the same text materials have to be uploaded to the network, and you need an electronic USB flash drive when you hand in the text materials! Really speechless!

2. All kinds of teacher training. Teachers are all from top to bottom. From top to bottom, some only write the teacher training in the document, as long as there is content in the later superior inspection. As for whether it is effective, it will not be considered. Some places organize teacher training. To put it bluntly, it is to make money. Try to get money from the teacher's pocket. Can such training be effective? In some places, teacher training is too theoretical and poorly integrated with the practice of front-line teachers. New theories and concepts of teacher training are flying all over the sky, but killing dragons is useless.

3. Make up lessons during holidays and winter and summer vacations. Normal class hours are enough, and you have to make up lessons for self-study sooner or later. It should be stipulated that no one (social organization) can make up lessons!

4. Writing experience after various studies and large lectures.

5. Do a good job in all kinds of written materials and electronic materials to meet all kinds of inspection and acceptance. Balanced education, building "ten rooms", library, psychological consultation room ... only deal with inspection, buy some equipment, the quality is poor, some can only watch, can not use, and there are not so many professional teachers, even if there are teachers, students are short of time, students have no chance to use!

6. Prepare lessons with the same lesson plan and check the teaching routine!

7. Various meetings, regular meetings, teachers' congresses, etc. Leaders talk one by one, regardless of the teacher's feelings, wasting time!

I hate that the superior has given us a classroom teaching model. It is called "effective teaching mode". The model specifies the contents of the first class and the second class of each class. ...

Originally, as a teaching and research institution in charge of teaching, it should guide the teaching activities of schools within its jurisdiction. However, it is stipulated that all teachers must write teaching plans according to the model in the research of teaching and research personnel's topics, and follow the steps of the model to the letter. Otherwise, the school leaders will be informed criticism, and the quantitative assessment of school teaching management will be deducted from the inspection of school teaching routine work by superiors.

Because of this, school leaders require teachers to carry out teaching work according to the requirements of superiors. If teachers don't follow the requirements, performance pay and assessment will be affected.

In my opinion, those specific teaching models, whether mathematics or Chinese, do have some merits. Especially for new teachers, if you don't know how to implement your teaching process, it is really helpful to follow those models (but I dare not present them here).

However, it is rigid and harsh to require thousands of teachers to prepare lessons and attend classes according to a unified model. For example, last semester, because of the epidemic, teachers took online classes at home, and the original teaching plans were not written according to those patterns. After the formal start of school, teachers are actually required to reorganize the lesson plans from scratch according to those models.

To this end, teachers feel speechless. Not to mention that doing so violates the concept of "teaching is uncertain". Is it of practical significance to teaching? I really didn't find any benefit to teaching except giving teachers trouble and wasting precious time.

I don't need to say what harm formalism like the above will do, what it will do and who it will target. You can boldly imagine.

1, various trainings. National training, provincial training, city training, county training and school training.

3, various exams. Law popularization exam, etc. Copy the answers and hand them in.

4. Various donations. Drought and flood control, send warm.

The first formalism: advocating reducing the burden on students, the result is counterproductive, and the burden on students is getting heavier and heavier! Both the senior high school entrance examination and the college entrance examination need children's scores, so while shouting about reducing the burden, tutoring institutions are blooming everywhere, and the burden on children has not been reduced. There is less homework to reduce the burden in class, and parents keep going to cram schools. Parents know that children can only complete these four docking by relying on foundation, grades and scores.

Especially in the current senior high school entrance examination, half of the students fail to enter high school every year. If your child's burden is lightened in junior high school and other children's burden is not lightened, then your child will fall behind and it will be difficult to get into senior high school! So the fact is that children with good grades will not reduce their burdens, but will sprint to better schools. Children with poor grades cannot reduce their burdens, otherwise they will not be admitted to high school or university.

The second formalism: the decision not to let WeChat assign homework is incomprehensible, allowing students to copy their own homework. However, many children will pay attention to copying less homework. Parents don't know that there are many homework, so they let their children take advantage. Obviously, the homework has not been finished, but the child lied that he had finished it.

The third formalism: it is good to talk too much about quality education. There is nothing wrong with grasping children's quality education, but we should also grasp children's cultural learning. Moreover, the scope of quality education is too general, and various formalistic activities are frequently organized to cope with superior inspections, which makes students confused, relaxes their sense of responsibility in learning and reduces their academic performance.

Therefore, it is necessary to correct some formalism in the field of education in combination with the actual and educational background.

The above contents and pictures are selected from the second volume of Guangdong Family Education Practical Manual.

Everything that is formalistic is disgusting, especially those that are only made to cope with the inspection.

First of all, there are a lot of inspections now, and people are tired of supervision, inspection and assessment. A lot of work is usually not emphasized, but as long as there are tasks above, all kinds of information, all kinds of system plans, all kinds of summaries, all kinds of data, so-called bookkeeping, if not, make up, make up. In fact, the inspection is just a formality, and everyone is determined to win.

Even in the teaching institute, there are many forms of classes every semester, and few of them are really instructive. My teaching and research staff in a certain subject is always late every time. He was scheduled to attend the third class, but he was always half a class late or even didn't attend class at all. Then we had to accompany him in the office and listen to his information or experience about preparing for the college entrance examination. This is a waste of time.

Second, many documents are vague and have no substantive content at all. They are all official rhetoric, but it seems that they have not been transmitted, copied and distributed at different levels, that is, they have not been implemented and are not in place.

Third, there is no fixed teaching method, and the best teaching method is the one that suits oneself and students. But now no matter what school, they all like to engage in various "teaching methods". This meeting will be implemented today, and no matter what the above says tomorrow, the following will not be tinkered with according to their own reality or where they heard some new tricks, but will be actively promoted. Form is greater than result. At first, it was full of excitement, and soon it was quiet and everything was back to its original state.

In fact, life is different, learning is different, and it is not advisable to apply mechanically.

The students I teach have a poor foundation. Now I'm in the promotion group to explore together. In class, I always design one or two problems for them to discuss and solve, draw a mind map, and then they show and explain their cooperation results. It was difficult at first, but it was slow. They are used to this way, they can basically draw maps, and they dare to go on stage to state their views. Their grades are slowly improving. It is definitely not feasible to mechanically copy other people's theories and laws.

Fourth, write papers every semester. It's okay to write a summary and reflect on teaching, but it's too formal to write a paper every semester. Not all teachers are good at writing papers, and they don't have much time to finish them, so they copy them online. Funnily enough, once a paper was to be exhibited, several people copied the same one. Laughing to death. It is better to sum up or reflect on the gains and losses of a semester and reflect on the successful experience and shortcomings. This is more conducive to future improvement.

Fifth, I hate acting classes, especially those that have gone through a lot of hardships. The students' answers are almost all cooked in the same mold, so perfect that they can't pick out a fault and have no generation at all. Students' thinking is beating, and everyone's understanding is different, but they all answer each question according to a routine, which is too fake as a reading standard answer. I prefer to listen to those classes that may have great shortcomings, but they are very real. Students' performance in class is very individual, their thinking is smart and their productivity is high. But this kind of class tests the teacher's ability to control.

Sixth, use information technology in order to use it, and use various means in the whole class. The abuse of information technology in some classes will destroy the integrity and beauty of a class. For example, it is clearly a lesson of Du Fu's poetry appreciation, in which there are answers that need to be played, all kinds of messy shouts and music, and the countdown will be counted down after a while, and then go, go and go will destroy all the desolation and depression of Du Fu's poetry. Once, in a competition class in the city, a contestant took part in Nian Nujiao's Red Cliff to remember the past. In the middle, several students went up and dragged several heads, bodies, hats, eyes and hairstyles to form their image of Zhou Yu. This session took more than ten minutes, which made people feel incredible. It seems that there are many information technologies, but in fact, these information technologies are only used, and I don't know what the teaching purpose is. Sure enough, when the experts commented later, they were specially given this lesson, and they were criticized to pieces.

Seventh, do what you like, and leaders do whatever they like, just to cater to them.

Eighth, sign various letters of responsibility and commitments. Nowadays, I like to sign the commitment letter easily. It seems that as long as I sign this paper, everything will be guaranteed. In fact, many people didn't even read the content.

Ninth, some continuing education is a waste of life, especially the long and smelly online training. Many have nothing to do with education and teaching, but you have to learn. There are countless exams. If it's an online exam, you won't even read all the questions. Just use an exam artifact to cut off a few keywords and search for answers. I just finished an exam a few days ago, 100 _ If it is a paper exam, there is always an answer copied at the same time. Let's get together and take a picture, and then the documents will be scattered.

Tenth, pretend to show it to the leaders. Some teachers, who obviously come late, are "busy" in the office after work, especially when the leaders will appear. There was once a colleague who left early and always came late, but she was very smart. Everyone else is busy after work. She changed her homework and talked with students in the office. The leaders praised her "dedication" many times. The teachers are all blown up: others go to work at two o'clock, and she doesn't come until almost four o'clock …

XI。 Now quality education is a form. Can college entrance examination and senior high school entrance examination remain unchanged to improve quality education? Examination and quality should not be antagonistic. Look at the results of the college entrance examination in a school in Nanjing and discuss the consequences of being besieged by parents.

Dear friends, what annoying formalism have you encountered?

1. Make up lessons during holidays and winter and summer vacations.

2. Write your own feelings after various political studies and large-scale lectures.

3. Meet all kinds of inspection and acceptance.

4. Prepare lessons with lesson plans.

5. Teachers' meeting.

Speaking of formalism in the field of education, many teachers hate it very much, and teachers suffer greatly.

Specifically, there are many such formalistic things in the field of education. First, various forms of study plans and homework correction checks, work materials, work trace records, conversation record, study notes, study notes and so on.

The second is various appraisal activities. Learning plan evaluation, courseware making evaluation, composition correction evaluation, reading experience evaluation, etc. , it's unbearable.

The third is to participate in the acceptance of health cities, community family planning, community law popularization, population survey, adolescent growth records, continuing education and learning, and law popularization. It is also something that teachers are overwhelmed and tired of coping with.

All the above activities and evaluations, etc. , so that teachers have no more energy to engage in education and teaching work, which affects the research of education and teaching work, makes them tired of coping, and encourages the atmosphere of fraud. Teachers hate formalism in these educational fields and should attach great importance to it and solve it.

There are many things about formalism.

1. Check the teaching plan once a month. Write the date on the last page of the examination of the Academic Affairs Office and affix the seal of the Academic Affairs Office. Teachers repeat the previous lesson plans year after year. Especially the chemistry teacher in junior high school teaches that book, copying the lesson plan once a year, which is almost dictation.

2. Work plan and summary. Work plans and summaries should be submitted at the beginning and end of the semester. Nobody will look at them. Teachers keep plans and summaries in order to complete tasks and hand them in when they are used.

3. Political study. Every Wednesday afternoon in our school is political study time. Every teacher in every grade has a fixed position, and the leader has a seating chart. The leader can tell who is absent at a glance. Most of the reports are made by secretaries, who say teachers take notes. Check your notes regularly and the secretary will grade them. There is an elder sister sitting next to me, her eyes blurred. I took notes and wrote them to her. Our notes are exactly the same, so the scores given by the leaders are different.

This is the most typical and common formalism, and there are many more, so I won't go into details one by one.

I hate burden reduction and quality education. Because quality education should be done by hand, handwritten newspaper, drawing, taking part in various competitions such as photography, composition, calligraphy, drawing and programming. Quality is also important, and most of the results are made by parents. My family often lets children do it by themselves, but what children waste a few hours drawing is not as good as what their parents make, which wastes time and dampens their enthusiasm. I really don't want children involved.

Reducing the burden is even more ridiculous. The senior high school entrance examination is also like that, requiring primary schools to reduce their burdens and leave no homework-as a result, parents buy their own exercise books and practice at home. Ask to reduce the burden, don't take the exam, don't publish the results-as a result, parents take the exam themselves in various units. Where is the burden reduction? Is to do what the original school should do at home. Not everyone can go to a prestigious school. If you have a good job, you are not qualified to talk about reducing the burden of education!

The biggest harm of formalism is that students are aware of formalism. Before the resumption of classes, I was asked to wear a mask on my way to school, and what to do when I entered the school. I put a mask in his lunch box pocket and asked him to wear it at the school gate. The child asked if it was only taken at the gate of our school. What's the use of taking it off in the classroom? I replied, "Show it to the people who check at the door."

During the summer vacation, the school asked not to gather, and there was a word "Don't gather" in the safety solitaire every day. A few days ago, some of their important friends made an appointment with their parents to attend a party at the villa. The child asked me how to send the solitaire, and I said, "It's still the same. This is a form for the school, and the party will not be delayed. "

Anyway, the third-grade children themselves know formalism very well, and it depends on them how to use it in the future.

There is no paid tutor, no burden reduction for students, no corporal punishment, no published results, no injury to children's self-esteem, no purchase of supplementary teaching materials, no make-up lessons ... There are countless forms of education.

If it is the most, I think it is the most self-deception to reduce the burden on students. How can I see a rainbow without experiencing wind and rain? Learning is a process of continuous consolidation. It is irresponsible for children to emphasize the workload of homework.

I admit that there are some gifted children with strong concentration, self-control and understanding and acceptance. Many repeated exercises are really a burden to them, but these people are a minority and can be treated differently.

For more children, if they don't make strict requirements, how can they really gain knowledge and enter a better platform?